Bandana Mohanty v. Bse
Case brief
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner at the time…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 3120 of 2011
Heard Mr. S.B. Jena, learned counsel for opposite party.
The petitioner has filed this application for rechecking and re-addition of marks in Annual HSC Examination -2010.
Mr. S.B. Jena, learned counsel for opposite party submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as in the meantime nine years have elapsed.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly as infructuous.
.………………………….
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Ajaya
Ajaya
Opposite Party
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court