Jayalaxmi Routray v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2019 05. uks 19.03.2019 This is an…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.3029 of 2019
I.A. No.5169 of 2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in paragraphs-3 and 5 of order dated 6.3.2019, the expression ‘appellate authority’ has been wrongly typed and the same should have been ‘competent authority’. The same may be corrected. Further the expression ‘tile’ be corrected as ‘title’.
Considering the submission made, the expressions ‘appellate authority’ be corrected as ‘competent authority’ and ‘tile’ be corrected as ‘title’. The order is modified to the above extent. Certified copy of the order be corrected accordingly.
I.A. is disposed of.
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
uks
2
3
uks
4
BK B
Dr.A.K.Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court