Single judge corrected a clerical error in an earlier order by substituting specific words regarding tenement ownership. The judgment disposed of a suo motu application to rectify the previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No.1360 of 2015 W.P.(C). No.18168 of 2008
W.P.(C).No.18168 of 2008 & W.P.(C).No.7597 of 2013
9 26.03.2019
These writ petitions have been listed suo motu for correction of the order dated 18.3.2019 passed by this Court therein.
The words “in favour of the tenements” appearing in the 7th & 8th line of last but one paragraph of the order dated 18.3.2019 (page-2) be deleted and in its place the words “of the tenements involved herein in favour of the petitioners” be substituted.
The rest part of the order dated 18.3.2019 shall remain unaltered.
……………………………. BISWANATH RATH,J
sks
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
