The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn based on the filed memo.
Permission to withdraw the writ application granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. (C) No.16359 of 2013
03 14.10.2019 In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this writ application, and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. To that effect, a memo has been filed in Court today. The same be kept on record.
In view of the memo filed, the writ application is dismissed, as withdrawn.
bns
Biswajit Mohanty, J.
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Biswajit Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
