In a writ petition where the petitioner failed to appear, the court found that the relief sought had been complied with based on a memo submitted by the opposite party's counsel. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Liberty of 30 days granted to the petitioner to revive the petition if the cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 15610 of 2011
On last of two occasions, i.e., 15th April, 2019 and 6th May, 2019, none had appears for the petitioner.
Even today, none appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. However, learned counsel for opposite party No.5 produces a memo annexing letter dated 27.12.2016 of Government of Odisha regarding completion of laying of iron ore slurry pipeline alongside of Banoi border and submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has been complied with.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty of 30 days is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition in case cause of action still survives.
Memo so filed be kept on record.
……..…………………
K.S. JHAVERI (CHIEF JUSTICE)
……..……………………
K.R. MOHAPATRA (JUDGE)
ss
Petitioner
Government of Odisha
K.S. JHAVERI
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
