Dismissed
Okila v. Nath
Orissa HCSA/4/1995
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
None appears for the appellant. This appeal…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
SA No. 04 of 1995
¶2
- 25.09.2019 None appears for the appellant.
¶3
This appeal is of the year 1995 and in the meantime
¶4
about 24 years have passed.
¶5
On 31.01.2018, following order was passed by this
¶6
Court:
¶7
“Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the sole respondent died during pendency of the appeal. He files a memo. Memo be kept on record.
¶8
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to take steps for substitution.
¶9
List this matter on 06.03.2018 under the heading “for order”.
¶10
However, no steps for substitution has yet been
¶11
taken.
¶12
In view of the above, the appeal stands dismissed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Unknown
- respondent
Sole Respondent (Deceased)
Coram
AI extract
K.S. Jhaveri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court