The single judge heard counsel for the appellant but noted the absence of the respondent and lack of requisites for notice. The appeal was dismissed against the first respondent while the matter was listed for further proceedings.
Appeal dismissed against Respondent No. 1; matter listed for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
F.A.O.No.536 of 2016
Sabita Behera an others
…. Appellants
Mr.A.S.Nandy, Advocate
-versus-
Jayanata Kumar Prusty and another …. Respondents None
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 5.4.2022
Order No.
C.R.Biswal
Sabita Behera
Jayanata Kumar Prusty
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
