The Single Judge dismissed CRLMC No.59 of 2019 for non-prosecution. The petitioner, challenging an order taking cognizance in a TR case, repeatedly sought adjournments. With no arguments advanced, the court refused further adjournment and dismissed the petition.
CRLMC No.59 of 2019 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.59 of 2019
It appears that on earlier occasion adjournment was sought for. Today also when the matter is called, adjournment is sought for by the learned cousnel for the petitioner.
I am not inclined to adjourn this matter once again. No argument is advanced.
Accordingly, the CRLMC stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
………………….. S.Pujahari, J.
RKS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. shall be dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated delay and lack of arguments.
Whether an adjournment in a revision petition is justified when no argument is advanced.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
