Soudamini Karan v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
None appeared for the petitioner when the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.2188 of 2018
None appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called in 1st hour. Also, none appears for the petitioner in spite of repeated calls in the 2nd hour. Learned counsel for the State is present.
In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is a recalcitrant litigant and does not want to proceed with the matter. Hence, this CRLMC stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
…………………..
S.Pujahari, J.
RKS
The Petitioner
The State
S. Pujahari, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court