Surjit Singh v. Orissa Industrial Ga
Case brief
What is this about?
Company Act petition seeking winding up and appointment of liquidator for a company was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMPANY ACT 3 of 1991
1
13 16.08.2019 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Heard Miss Sagarika Sahoo on behalf of Mr. G. Mukherji, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 and 3.
Miss Sagarika Sahoo, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 and 3 states that she has no instructions.
Perused the record. The petitioner has filed this Company Act petition seeking for direction to wind up opposite party no.1-Company and appoint Liquidator to look after the company itself.
Since none is there to pursue the matter, Company Act petition stands dismissed.
……………………..……
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, Company Judge
Alok
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Opposite Party No.1 and Company
Opposite Parties No.2 and 3
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court