The Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for offences under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act, noting the duration of detention and absence of other impediments.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the court in seisin of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BLAPL NO. 44 OF 2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the materials as placed, further keeping in view the surrounding circumstances including the period of detention of the petitioner in custody and in the absence of any other impediment, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the court in seisin of the case.
The BLAPL is accordingly disposed.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
……………………..
D. Dash, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in connection with offences under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act.
Whether any impediment exists to grant bail to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
