Aditya Narayan Jena v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge extended the time for surrender of the petitioner by three weeks and reiterated that no further extension will be entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.10587 of 2019
I.A. No.68 of 2020
Heard.
Three weeks’ further time from today is extended for the petitioner to surrender before the competent Court in continuation of the earlier order passed in the ABLAPL, other conditions in the said order remaining the same.
It is made clear that, in no event whatsoever, further petition for extension of time shall not be entertained.
The Registry of this Court is directed to reflect this part of the order, if any petition is filed in this case for extension of time.
The I.A is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be
granted as per rules.
………………………….
Murmu
Petitioner
Competent Court
Murmu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court