Dismissed
Sunil Kumar Behera v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCWP(C)/4565/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C). No. 4565 of 2015
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
It appears that in the meantime the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
However, it is open for the petitioner to revive this petition if any cause of action is survived.
.…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
…………………..……… ( Dr. B. R. Sarangi ) Judge
Ad/mp
K.S. Jhaveri
Dr. B. R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court