Dismissed
Sarada Pr.Sahoo v. Principal,Sainik Sc
Orissa HCWP(C)/14603/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn upon filing of a withdrawal memo by counsel.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.14603 of 2013
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo in Court today, seeking withdrawal of the writ application.
Mr. T.N. Pattnaik, Advocate for opposite party no.3 is present.
In view of the memo filed, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
…………………. Dr.A.K. Rath, J.
uks
2
uks
3
BK B
Dr. A.K. Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court