Sushanta v. G.M.Grid Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
10.07.2018 None appears on behalf of the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.J.C. No.18528 of 1997
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call. Learned Counsel for the opposite party nos.1 & 2 is present in Court.
This is a matter of the year 1997. This matter is pending since long. It appears, the petitioner has no interest in the matter.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
…….………………… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
2
3
Petitioner
Opposite party nos.1 & 2
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court