The High Court dismissed an appeal for non-payment of deficit court fees despite prior directions, holding it not maintainable due to the court's association strike.
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable for non-payment of deficit court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MACA No.107 of 2016
This appeal has been filed by the owner of the vehicle. Despite directions dated 16.07.2016 & 10.11.2016, the appellant is not paying the deficit Court fees. Therefore, this Motor Accident Claims Appeal is not maintainable.
Accordingly, this Motor Accident Claims Appeal stands dismissed.
.…….……………..… (Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Motor Accident Claims Appeal is maintainable in absence of payment of deficit Court fees despite previous directions.
Owner of the vehicle
Undisclosed
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
