Single-judge High Court order correcting inaction by police. Court directed registration of a written report under Lalita Kumari precedent and disposed the criminal leave to maintain plea.
Direction to police to register the written report and take follow-up actions as per Lalita Kumari.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No. 1078 of 2016
None appears for the petitioner.
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Perused the record. This application has been filed against non-registration of the FIR.
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
In view of the law laid down by the apex Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1, written report should be registered by the police. Since written report has not been registered, this Court directs to register the written report and to take follow up action in accordance with law as per the judgment in Lalita Kumari (supra).
With the above observation and direction, the CRLMP stands disposed of.
....………………………...
(Dr. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police were directed to register a written report due to failure to do so.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar PradeshApplied¶7
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
None
State
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
