Nityananda Panigrahi v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner did not press the CRLMC but sought liberty to raise points at the time of charge. The court dismissed the application withdrawn with said liberty, determining no substantive legal principles or general application issues were decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.2614 of 2018
- 06.12.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this CRLMC, but submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to raise all the points at the time of charge.
Accordingly, the CRLMC stands dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
………………….. S.Pujahari, J.
DA
Coram
S.Pujahari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court