The High Court dismissed a CRLMC challenging a lower court maintenance order. The bench held that the impugned order was descriptive and detailed, and there was no ground for interference or quashing.
The CRLMC is dismissed. The interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.1514 of 2007
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the opposite party.
The CRLMC stands dismissed.
The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
Communicate this order to the learned trial Court forthwith.
………………………… Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J.
jm
2
jm
3
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appellate court should quash a detailed order directing maintenance payment when the underlying facts are untroubled.
Petitioner
Opposite Party
Dr.D.P.Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
