In this application for restoration of a dismissed Bail Application lapsed by over ten years, the court deferred to judicial review principles. Finding the delay unjustified, the application was dismissed when the petitioner failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMA NO. 13 OF 2008
Heard learned Additional Government Advocate. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called.
This is an application for restoration of BLAPL No. 10673 of 2007, which has been dismissed by order dated 30.10.2008.
Considering the submission made and on going through the petition averments as well as the order dated 30.10.2008, further viewing the factum of lapse of more than 10 years since the order as aforesaid, the application stands dismissed.
……………………..
Narayan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for restoration of a dismissed Bail Application must be allowed after a lapse of more than ten years?
Petitioner
Respondent
Narayan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
