Dismissed
Mirzakar v. Akshya
Orissa HCAHO/149/1995
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a one-line order summarily dismissing an appeal for want of prosecution due to the absence of the appellant on revised call. No substantial legal principle or reasoning is provided.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
AHO No. 149 of 1995
¶2
- 11.05.2018 No one is present on behalf of the appellant even on revised call.
¶3
Mr. A.K.Mohanty, learned counsel is present on behalf of opposite party.
¶4
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶5
…….......……………… ( VINEET SARAN ) CHIEF JUSTICE
¶6
……..………………….. ( DR. B.R.SARANGI ) JUDGE
¶7
dm
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Opposite party
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court