In this single-line application for anticipatory bail under Sections 379/34 IPC, the High Court granted relief in the absence of lawyers due to a strike, directing release on bail should the petitioner be arrested.
Directions to release the petitioner on bail if arrested, subject to terms by the arresting officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.13308 of 2018
In this application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner is allegedly involved in Tangarpali P.S. Case No.103 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No.540 of 2018 pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C(R), Panposh for commission of offence under Sections 379/34 IPC.
None appears for the parties.
Perused the FIR.
Considering the facts and circumstances of
the case, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the arresting officer may deem fit and proper.
The bail application is disposed of.
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
p/bkb
1 issue framed by the court
whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail.
Petitioner
Dr. A.K. Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
