Disposed
Rajendra@Hemanta Mathan v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCABLAPL/12360/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL NO.12360 of 2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present presumably, in view of the cease work call given by the Orissa High Court Bar Association.
None appears on behalf of the State. The record pertaining to the case has also not been placed.
Considering the accusations made against the petitioner and keeping in view the surrounding circumstances; it is directed that in case the petitioner has not been arrested and further dealt in accordance with law; in the event of his arrest in Bansada P.S. Case No.108 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No.228 of 2018, pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandbali, he shall be released on bail by the arresting officer on such terms and conditions as the arresting officer may deem just and proper.
The ABLAPL is disposed of.
This order be communicated immediately to the
person concerned.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per
rules.
D. Dash, J.
Basu
Petitioner
State
Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court