The court, considering the gravity of the alleged offense and injury to a vital part of the body, declined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and dismissed the application.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No. 10582 of 2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel, and also perused the case diary.
Considering the nature and gravity of offense alleged against the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the injury has been inflicted on the vital part of the body, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
The ABLAPL stands dismissed.
(Dr. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner ought to be released on anticipatory bail given the gravity of the offense and injury to a vital part.
Petitioner
State
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
