Urmila Sahoo v. Collector,Cuttack
Orissa HCWP(C)/6938/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.6938 of 2015 4. 08.05.2017 Heard. Sri…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
W.P.(C). No.6938 of 2015
¶2
4. 08.05.2017 Heard.
¶3
Sri Dash, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State referri
ng to letter dated 27.3.2017 makes a statement that since the action, as desired by the petit
ioner, has already undertaken, the matter has become infructuous.
¶4
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
¶5
BISWANATH RATH,J.
¶6
(JUDGE)
¶7
sks
¶8
-2-
Coram
AI extract
BISWANATH RATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court