The court disposed of the writ petition directing the Bank to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.2.2017 and take a decision expeditiously within four weeks.
Directing the Bank to take a decision on the petitioner's representation dated 20.2.2017 within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.3459 of 2017
5. 13.9.2017 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is cal
led.
Heard learned counsel for the opp.party-Bank.
This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the opp.
party-Bank to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.2.2017 (Annexure-2) and t
o take decision thereon expeditiously.
Learned counsel for the opp.party-Bank on instruction submits that the
representation of the petitioner dated 22.2.2017 is under consideration and decision of the s
ame shall be taken shortly.
Considering the submission made, the writ petition is disposed of dire
cting the opp.party-Bank to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.2
.2017 (Annexure-2) as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks under
intimation to the petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
S.C. Parija, J.
D. Dash, J.
Aks
2
Petitioner
Bank
S.C. Parija
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court