The single-judge High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2010 Tender Call Notice. The court held that due to the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous and was dismissed accordingly without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 19539 of 2010
04. 09.10.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
The issue involved in this writ petition relates to Tender Call Notice issued
in the year 2010.
In our view, by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
Petitioner
Respondent
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R.SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court