Dismissed
Biplab Ku.Parida v. State and Ors.
Orissa HCWP(C)/18970/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon counsel stating the application no longer required adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 18970 of 2013
24.04.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press t
his application, as the same has become infructuous in the meantime. A memo with the same pray
er has also been filed. The same be kept on record.
¶2
Mr. A. Dash, learned counsel for opposite party no.7 is present.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶3
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite party no.7
Coram
AI extract
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court