Dismissed
Govinda v. Budhimanta
Orissa HCSA/193/1989
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appellant did not appear before the court. Counsel for the respondents was present. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A. No.193 of 1989
¶2
01.09.2017
¶3
On 21.7.2017, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he had no instr
uction. This Court directed the office to verify as to whether any counsel has entered appeara
nce on behalf of the appellant. Again the matter was listed on 11.08.2017 and was adjourned to
today.
¶4
Office pointed out that no counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the app
ellant. The matter was called for hearing twice today.
¶5
Mr. N.K. Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
¶6
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶7
.......
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
¶8
3
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
AI extract
Dr. A.K. Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court