Rajesh Ku.Agarwalla v. Bibhuti Bh.Behera
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner moved under Contempt No. 1475 of 2016 regarding non-compliance with orders dated 30.09.2015 and 08.10.2015. The Judge held that since no time limit was fixed for compliance, no contempt lay and dropped the proceedings, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate court for fixation of a time limit.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings dropped. Petitioner directed to approach appropriate court for fixation of time limit for compliance.