Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no any stolen material seized
from the possession of the present petitioner although the petitioner has been identified in
the T.I. parade. He further submits that in the meantime, charge sheet has been submitted and
the petitioner is in custody since 24.3.2015, for which lenient view may be taken to release t
he petitioner on bail on any condition as deemed just and proper. Learned Addl. Standing Couns
el opposes the prayer for bail stating that the petitioner is involved in the crime and as he
was identified by the identifying witnesses during the T.I. parade.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, regard being
had to the facts and circumstances of the case including the statement of identifying witnes
ses who stated to have identified him as the petitioner had tied him and committed dacoity but
there is no recovery of any stolen material from the possession of the present petitioner, fa
ct that charge sheet in this case has been filed and fact that the petitioner being a local pe
rson there is no chance of his absconding or influencing the witnesses, let the petitioner be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000.00 (rupees fifty thousand) with two solv
ent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Bargarh in C.T.
Case No.275 of 2015 with the conditions that (i)The petitioner shall appear before the court
in seisin over the matter on each date of posting;(ii) he shall not tamper with the prosecutio
n witnesses directly or indirectly; and (iii) he shall not commit any offence while on bail.
Violation of any of the aforesaid terms shall entail cancellation of the bail.
Accordingly, the BLAPL is disposed of.
