Disposed

Jamil Seikh v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC3 Jan 2017BLAPL/3879/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. involving offences under Sections 370/374 IPC and sections 16-18 BLSA Act, the court ordered the petitioner's release on furnishment of bond of Rs. 50,000 and specific undertakings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 50,000 with two local sureties for Rs. 50,000 each subject to standard bail conditions.

Jamil Seikh Vs State of Orissa — Narcotics (NDPS) | Orissa HC (2017)

¶1

BLAPL No.3879 of 2016

¶2

05. 03.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and t
he learned State Counsel on the application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for release of the petit
ioner bail who allegedly involved with the offence under Sections 370(5)/374 of the IPC and Se
ctions 16/17/18 of B.L.S.A. Act.

¶3

 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prima facie case again
st the petitioner has not been made out because the labourers have not been trafficked and the
y were all picked up from the railway station. He further submits that in the meantime charge
sheet has been submitted for which lenient view may be taken to release the petitioner on bai
l on any condition as deemed just and proper. Learned State Counsel opposes the prayer for bai
l.

¶4

 3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parti
es regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case including the nature of allegat
ion and nature of offence and the fact that in the meantime charge sheet has been submitted, l
et the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000.00 (rupees fifty th
ousand) with two solvent local sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the le
arned J.M.F.C., Kesinga in C.T. No.134 of 2016 with the condition that (1) The petitioner shal
l appear before the court in seisin over the matter on each date of posting (ii) he shall not
tamper with the prosecution witnesses directly or indirectly and (iii) he shall not commit any
 offence while on bail.

¶5

 Violation of any of the aforesaid terms shall entail cancellation of t

¶6

he bail.

¶7

Accordingly the BLAPL is disposed of.

¶8

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶9

Dr.D.P.Choudhury,J

¶10

Basu

¶11

- 2 -

Jamil Seikh v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamil Seikh v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintamani Sahoo Vs State of Orissa

Muna Sahu Vs State of Orissa

Bablu@Bijay Kumar Singh Vs State of Orissa

Ananta Bhoi Vs State of Orissa

Basudev Nayak Vs State of Orissa

Akhila Rohi Das Vs State of Orissa