Laxman Charan Hati v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against a decree reversing the title suit of the appellant. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; judgment and decree of the lower appellate court upheld.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK
RSA No.186 of 2011
From the judgment and decree dated 29.1.2011 and 10.2.2011 respectively passed by Sri S.K. Pattnaik, learned District Judge, Bhadrak-Balasore in RFA No.139 of 2004 reversing the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2003 and 23.12.2003 respectively passed by Sri D.Panda, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaleswar in Title Suit No.194 of 2003.
----------Laxman Charan Hati …. Appellant Versus State of Orissa …. Respondent For Appellant … Mr. Satyasiva Das, Advocate For Respondent … Addl. Government Advocate
J U D G M E N T
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH
Date of hearing: 04.11.2016 : Date of judgment: 04.11.2016
Dr. A.K.Rath, J This is an appeal against the judgment and decree 29.1.2011 and 10.2.2011 respectively passed by the learned District Judge, Bhadrak in RFA No.139 of 2004 reversing the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2003 and 23.12.2003 respectively passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaleswar in T.S. No.194 of 2003.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal requires the determination of any substantial question of law.
Whether the suit was barred by limitation under Section 42 of the Orissa Survey and Settlement Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Laxman Charan Hati
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
DR. A.K.RATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court