Dismissed
Purna v. State
Orissa HCOJC/6914/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Single Judge held that a writ petition filed in 1996 had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The learned counsel for the respondent raised no objection.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No.6914 of 1996
¶2
12. 28.09.2016 The matter is of the year 1996. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time the pr ayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶3
Mr. Millan Kumar Badu, learned counsel for Union of India has got no objection
¶4
In view thereof the writ petition is rendered as infructuous and dismissed as
¶5
such.
¶6
... S.N. Prasad, J.
¶7
mkp
1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
S.N. Prasad, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court