Dismissed
Jawaharlal v. State
Orissa HCOJC/10614/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a memo stating the writ application had become infructuous and was seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the memo and dismissed the writ application as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ application was dismissed as infructuous following the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 10614 of 1996
¶2
08.12.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo in Court today states that the pe
titioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ application, as the same has become infructuous
¶3
. The memo so filed be kept on record
¶4
In view of the above, the writ application stands dismissed as infructuous.
¶5
Dr. B.R. Sarangi,J.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court