Dismissed
Sarbeswar Nayak v. State
Orissa HCCRLMC/2200/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the application against the impugned order of the subordinate judiciary taking cognizance of an offence under section 409 IPC, finding no illegality.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed; no relief granted to the petitioner. Intimate the Trial Court accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CRLMC No. 2200 of 2009
¶2
06.09.2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
¶3
Perused the order dated 25.05.2006 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur in G.R. Case
No. 145 of 2004 which is impugned in this case.
¶4
As it appears, learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur, on perusal of the First Information Report, c
ase diary and other relevant materials available on record and finding of the prima facie mate
rials against the petitioner to have committed the offence under section 409 of the Indian Pen
al Code has taken cognizance of the offence.
¶5
I find no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order.
¶6
Accordingly, the application filed by the petitioner stands dismissed.
Intimate the learned Trial Court accordingly.
¶7
S. K. Sahoo, J.
¶8
3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether there was any illegality or infirmity in the order of the S.D.J.M., Jajpur, taking cognizance of the offence under section 409 IPC?
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
S. K. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court