The Supreme Court dismissed Misc. Case No. 24 of 2019 as infructuous because the applicant's prayer for extension of time to complete arbitration proceedings had become moot after the Arbitrator had already passed an award.
The misc. case was dismissed as infructuous since the arbitration award was already passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ARBP No. 7 of 2012
Misc. Case No.24 of 2019
( Dr. S. Muralidhar ) Chief Justice
S.K.Jena/PA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for extension of time remains maintainable after the Arbitrator has passed an award.
Dr. S. Muralidhar
S.K. Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
