Disposed

Siba Prasad Nayak v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC15 Dec 2015WP(C)/21920/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought direction to regularize his temporary services rendered since 1990 due to non-sanctioning of the post. The single-judge bench directed the State Authority to expediently consider university recommendations and sanction posts, prescribing a four-month timeline.

What did the court decide?

Directed State Authority to consider university recommendation for regularization of petitioner's services and sanction posts within four months.

The petitioner files this application seeking for a direction to the opposite parties to regularize his services and grant all consequential benefits as due and admissible to him in accordance with law.

Ms. Deepali Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has rendered service under the opposite parties w.e.f.1990 till date on temporary basis, but d ue to non-sanctioning of the post by the Government his services has not been regularized. It is stated that though efforts have been made from the side of the university authority by reco mmending his name vide letters dated 18.10.2011, 27.09.2013, 30.04.2013 and 12.08.2015 vide A nnexures-4, 5, 6 and 8 respectively, no action has been taken by the State till date. There ar e 63 nos. of vacancies are available, but due to apathetic attitude of the authority neither t he posts have been sanctioned nor his services has been regularized. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate states that since correspondences have been made by the university authorities to the State Government, let the State Authority consi der the recommendation made vide Annexures-4,5,6 and 8 with regard to regularization of servic es of the petitioner along with others and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Considering the contention raised by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petit ion is disposed of directing the State Authority to consider the recommendation made by the un iversity authority vide Annexures-4, 5, 6 and 8 and pass appropriate order by sanctioning the posts and regularize the services of the petitioner taking into consideration that he is conti nuing in service w.e.f. 1990 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably w ithin a period of four months from the date of communication of this order.

Siba Prasad Nayak v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siba Prasad Nayak v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kartikaswara Sahu Vs State of Orissa

State of Orissa Vs Narendra Ku.Rout

Bhubanananda Jena Vs State of Odisha

Budhuram Oram Vs State of Orissa

Khirod Pradhan Vs State of Orissa

Kishore Chandra Padhy Vs Secretary,Panchayat Raj Dept.