Partly allowed

In the matter of Sterling Lam Ltd. [IA-522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet-2(AHM)2024, IA-195(AHM)2024 in Cp(Ib) 72(AHM)2018]

NCLT22 Feb 2024IA-522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet-2(AHM)2024, IA-195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal addressed three applications regarding the distribution of funds in the Sterling Lam Ltd. insolvency case. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in State Tax Officer vs Rainbow Paper Ltd., the court held that the State Tax Department is a secured creditor. The court ordered the Resolution Professional to distribute a specific sum of Rs. 1.31 crore to claimants within seven days, whi

What did the court decide?

The Resolution Professional was directed to distribute Rs. 1,31,19,769.08 to claimants including the State Tax Department (treated as secured creditor) within seven days. The other two applications we

In the matter of Sterling Lam Ltd. [IA-522(AHM)2021… — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | NCLT (2024)

¶1

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD DIVISION BENCH

¶2

COURT – 1

¶3

ITEM No.302- IA/522(AHM)2021 ITEM No.303- Inv.P/2(AHM)2024 in IA/522(AHM)2021 ITEM No.304 - IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72 of 2018

¶4

Order Under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016 In the matter of IA/522(AHM)2021 Kailash T Shah RP of Sterling Lam Ltd ….Applicant V/s Gujarat State Tax Department ….Respondent Order Under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016 In the matter of : Inv. P/2(AHM)2024 in IA/522(AHM)2021 The Cosmos Co. Op. Bank Ltd Financial Creditor and Sole CoC Member of Sterling Lam Ltd ….Applicant Vs Kailash T Shah RP Sterling Lam Ltd …Respondent Order Under Section 60(5) IBC r.w Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 In the matter of : IA/195(AHM)2024 The Cosmos Co. Op. Bank Ltd Financial Creditor & Sole CoC Member of Sterling Lam Ltd …. Applicant Vs Kailash T Shah RP of Sterling Lam Ltd …Respondent

¶5

Order delivered on: 22/02/2024

¶6

Coram:

¶7

Mr. Shammi Khan, Hon’ble Member (J) Mr. Sameer Kakar, Hon’ble Member (T)

¶8

PRESENT: For the Applicant : For the Respondent : ORDER

¶9

The case is fixed for pronouncement of order. The order is pronounced in open Court, vide separate sheet.

¶10

-SD- -SDSAMEER KAKAR SHAMMI KHAN MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

¶11

Rajeev/PS

¶12

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, DIVISION BENCH - I, AHMEDABAD

¶13

IA/522(AHM)2021 Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018

¶14

IA/522(AHM)2021 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018

¶15

[An application filed under Sections 25(a), 32A, 60(5) and 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016]

¶16

KAILASH SHAH

¶17

(RP of M/s Sterling Lam Limited) Having address at: 505, 21^st Century Business Centre, Near World Trade Centre, Surat, Gujarat-395002.

¶18

….Applicant

¶19

Versus

¶20

GUJARAT STATE TAX DEPARTMENT

¶21

Through State Tax Officer Having address at: Unit-29, Prantij, Opp. Bhankhariya Bus Stand, At & PO- Prantij, District Sabarkantha, Gujarat-383205 .

¶22

….Respondent

¶23

AND

¶24

Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018

¶25

[An application under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016]

¶26

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶27

1 of 16

¶28

THE COSMOS CO. OP. BANK LTD.,

¶29

(Financial Creditor and Sole Member

¶30

of Sterling Lam Ltd.) Having address at: Cosmos Bank Bhawan, Income Tax Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009.

¶31

… Applicant (Third Party Intervener)

¶32

Versus

¶33

1. Mr. KAILASH T. SHAH

¶34

(RP of Sterling Lam Ltd.) Having address at: 505, 21^st Century Business Center, Near World Trade Centre, Ring Road, Surat, Gujarat-395002.

¶35

….Respondent (Ori. Applicant)

¶36

2. GUJARAT SATE TAX DEPARTMENT

¶37

Through State Tax Officer Having address at: Unit-29, Prantij, Opp. Bhankhariya Bus Stand, At&Post Prantij, Dist-Sabarkantha Gujarat-383205.

¶38

… Respondent (Ori. Respondent)

¶39

AND

¶40

IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018

¶41

[An application under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016 r.w. Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016]

¶42

THE COSMOS CO. OP. BANK LTD.

¶43

(Financial Creditor and Sole Member of Sterling Lam Ltd.)

¶44

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶45

2 of 16

¶46

Having address at: Cosmos Bank Bhawan, Income Tax Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009.

¶47

….Applicant

¶48

Versus

¶49

1. Mr. KAILASH T. SHAH

¶50

(RP of Sterling Lam Ltd.) Having address at: 505, 21^st Century Business Center, Near World Trade Centre, Ring Road, Surat, Gujarat-395002.

¶51

2. NARESH TRADELINK PRIVATE LIMITED

¶52

(Resolution Applicant) Having address at: 304, “Aditya” B/h. Sardar Patel Samaj Hall, Nr. Mithakhali Six Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380006.

¶53

….Respondents

¶54

Order Pronounced On: 22.02.2024

¶55

CORAM:

¶56

SH. SHAMMI KHAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) SH. SAMEER KAKAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

¶57

Appearance:

¶58

For the Applicant : Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sandeep Bhatt, Advocate

¶59

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

3 of 16

O R D E R

[Per: Bench]

IA/522(AHM)2021 is an application filed by the Applicant–Resolution Professional ( “RP” ) on 29.07.2021 under Sections 25(a), 32A, 60(5) and 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ( “IBC, 2016” ) with the following prayers:-

¶64

a) Your Lordship may be pleased to allow the present application;

¶65

b) Your Lordship may be pleased to direct Respondent for removing encumbrances/charges from the factory land, as specified in para 8 above, of the corporate debtor in terms of Section 32A of the Code;

¶66

c) Your Lordship may be pleased to hold that the claim of respondent shall be paid in accordance with Section 53 of the Code;

¶67

d) Your Lordship may be pleased to grant any other relief or reliefs as may be deemed fit in the interest of justice;

¶68

It is stated that CP(IB) 72 of 2018 was filed under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016 which came to be ordered on 10.11.2020. Pursuant to the invitation of claim, the Gujarat State Tax Department submitted a claim for a sum of Rs.38,58,19,833/- under Form-B which was accepted for a sum of Rs.3,37,65,975/-. Thereafter, the

¶69

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶70

4 of 16

¶71

RP found while going through the land revenue records of the factory premises that a burden note/encumbrance has been entered by the Respondent herein upon the factory land being survey no. 388, 405 of Village - Mahiyal, Taluka - Talod. The encumbrance was for a sum of Rs.47,52,564/- for the year 2014-15 including interest a sum of Rs.2,31,84,958/- for the year 2017-18 and sum of Rs.1,05,81,017/- for the year 2018-19.

¶72

Thereafter, the RP sent an email on 27.04.2021 to the Respondent requesting the Respondent to remove the encumbrance since the claim filed was accepted by the RP.

¶73

As the Respondent has not removed the encumbrance another email was sent on 03.07.2021, however, the encumbrance continued.

¶74

The same was discussed in the 4^th Committee of Creditors ( “CoC” ) meeting held on 28.04.2021.

¶75

It is the contention of the RP that because of the said

¶76

encumbrance, he was unable to perform duties under

¶77

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶78

5 of 16

¶79

the Code and that Sections 32A to Section 238 of the Code stand violated.

¶80

During the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ( “CIRP” ), the RP invited Resolution Plans for the Corporate Debtor. One M/s. Naresh Tradelink Private Limited gave a plan which was approved by the CoC pursuant to which this Tribunal vide order dated 29.06.2022 approved the Resolution Plan submitted by the said M/s. Naresh Tradelink Private Limited for the reasons stated in the said order. The following payments were envisaged in the Resolution Plan:-

¶81

*Resolution*	*Amount (in Rs.)*	*Timelines*	*Para*	of
*Applicant*			*Resolution*	*Plan*
*Proposed Amount*
*Payment of CIRP*	45 Lakhs	Within 30	Addendum	to
*Cost*		days from	Resolution	Plan
The estimated		effective date	dated
CIRP Cost is Rs. 45			13.10.2021
Lakhs. The
Resolution
Applicant Propose to pay a sum of Rs. 45 Lakhs for payment in CIRP Cost. Any change in the CIRP cost
(increase or decrease) would
be adjusted against the

¶82

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶83

6 of 16

¶84

payments to be made to Secured Financial Creditors so that overall financial obligation of the Resolution Applicant remains unchanged.
*Payment to the* *Financial* *Creditors* *(excluding* *the* *Related* *Party* *Creditor)* Resolution Applicant Propose to pay a sum of Rs. 7,85,00,000/- against admitted amount of Rs. *17,00,42,520/-*	7,85,00,000/- (46.10%)	EMD-Rs. 10 lakhs. PBG (deposit)- Rs. 40 lakhs Rs. 235 Lakhs Upfront payment	Addendum to Resolution Plan dated 13.10.2021 within 30 Days from Approval of plan by Adjudicating Authority. Balance Rs. 500 lakhs within 60 days from the approval of plan by the Adjudicating Authority with interest of Rs. 4.17 lakhs.
*Payment* *towards* *the* *Operational* *Creditors, Other* *Creditors* *and* *related* *party* (Excluding Employees and workmen and Govt. Dues)	50,211(0.082%)	To be paid within 30 days of approval of Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority	Para 4.5 of the Resolution Plan
*Payment toward* *Employee* *and* *workmen)*	NIL	____________	Para 4.2 of the Resolution Plan
*Payment* to *Statutory* *Dues* *of CD*	52,069/- (0.013%)	To be paid within 30 days of approval of Resolution	Para 4.7 of the Resolution Plan

¶85

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶86

7 of 16

¶87

As per IM total Plan by the
admitted dues are Adjudicating
5,20,69,239/- Authority
Payment to 0.1% of the Para 4.7.1.1 of
Contingent crystalized ________ the Resolution
Liabilities of CD amount with Plan
Contingent upper cap of Rs.
Liabilities are in 50,000
the form of pending
litigations and are
subject to final
outcome of such
litigations
Payment to a.The ______
Shareholders of Liquidation
CD Value of the
Equity
Shareholder is
estimated to be
NIL
b.The equity
shares held by
the shareholders
of the corporate
debtor shall
stand cancelled.
TOTAL BID Rs.
AMOUNT 8,31,52,280/-

¶88

IA/522(AHM)2021 was not disposed off at the time of approval of the Resolution Plan and was heard from time to time. The order dated 13.12.2022 records as under:-

¶89

“Ld. Counsel appearing for the State Tax Department submitted that in view of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment in State Tax Officer vs Rainbow Paper Ltd. in Civil Appeal No. 1661/2020 they have written a letter to the RP to treat the State Tax Officer Department as a Secured Creditor. Ld. Counsel for the RP submitted that he will take

¶90

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶91

8 of 16

¶92

a call on this and he has kept that amount separately. We recorded this fact. Since the Ld. Counsel for the RP seeks some time, the matter stands adjourned.”.

¶93

Reply was filed by the State Tax Officer under Inward Diary No. D2719 dated 31.12.2021. Under para 4 of the reply, it is stated that the encumbrances/charge over the factory land belonging to the Corporate Debtor for survey no. 388 and 405 situated at Village: Mahiyal, Taluka: Talod, District: Sabarkantha was created vide entry no. 4538 and 4638 respectively for the recovery of outstanding tax dues and these mutation entries and tax amount due are way prior to the initiation of the proceedings under the I&B Code.

¶94

Further, under para 7 of the reply, it is stated that amount outstanding is an amount due under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act. Therefore, State has a first charge on the property as per Section 48 which provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law for the time being in force, any amount payable by a dealer or any other person on account of tax, interest or penalty for which he is liable to pay the

¶95

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶96

9 of 16

¶97

Government shall be a first charge on the property of such dealer, or as the case may be, such person.

¶98

It is stated that the State charge which is created prior to initiation of the proceeding in the I&B Code then a harmonious reading of these two acts will make it clear that the State tax is a first charge on the property of the Corporate Debtor.

¶99

Thereafter, the Respondent relied upon the similar matter covered under Special Civil Application No.23256 of 2019 wherein the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has delved upon the matter and has stayed the implementation of the order dated 18.11.2019 passed by NCLT Mumbai Bench in Misc. Application No.2357 of 2019 through which the Tribunal had directed the concerned authorities to lift the attachment of the property in question so that it can be put to sell by the liquidator and, thereupon, the sale proceeds be distributed under Section 53 of the I&B Code in order of priority described therein.

¶100

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶101

10 of 16

¶102

Meanwhile, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has passed an order in the matter of State Tax Officer (1) Vs Rainbow Papers Limited in Civil Appeal No.1661 of 2020.

¶103

Order dated 22.09.2023 records that Counsels in the matter requested that this Tribunal may await the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the review matter of Rainbow Papers Limited.

¶104

Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 was filed on 30.01.2024 by the sole Financial Creditor (Cosmos Co. Op. Bank Ltd.) to the Corporate Debtor seeking the following reliefs:-

¶105

(A) This Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to allow the present application in the interest of justice,

¶106

(B) This Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the Applicant – RP to join Third Party Intervener – The Cosmos Co. Op. Bank Ltd., as Party respondent no. 2 in the present IA 522/2021. Subsequently, be pleased to permit the Third Party Intervener bank to defend the IA 522/2021 by filing necessary reply.

¶107

(C) To order the cost of this Application.

¶108

(D) To grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶109

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶110

11 of 16

¶111

It is the contention of the Applicant that the order dated

¶112

29.06.2022 (order of approval of the Resolution Plan) records as under:-

¶113

“11. Heard the counsel of the applicant and perused the material on record. It is noted that the resolution plan submitted by M/s Naresh Tradelink Private Limited has been approved by the CoC in the 7^th meeting dated 13.10.2021 with 100% votes (Sole member of CoC). The resolution applicant has proposed an amount of Rs.45,00,000/- as a CIRP Cost. The amount proposed by the resolution applicant for the financial creditor is Rs. 7,85,00,000/- and for the operational creditors, the resolution applicant proposed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,02,280/-. The resolution professional has also made a provision for the contingent liability of 0.1% of the admitted debt but that shall not be more than Rs. 50,000/-”.

¶114

It is the contention of the Applicant that the Resolution Applicant cannot be saddled with the previous claim against the Corporate Debtor prior to initiation of CIRP.

¶115

It is the contention of the Applicant that the entire amount of Rs.7.85 crores be paid to the Applicant.

¶116

Meanwhile, on 08.11.2023 the State Tax Department issued a letter dated 08.11.2023 to the RP requesting to consider a fresh Resolution Plan of M/s. Sterling Lam Limited (Corporate Debtor).

¶117

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶118

12 of 16

¶119

It is the contention of the Applicant that since the Resolution Plan has already been approved vide order dated 29.06.2022, the question of consideration of a fresh Resolution Plan does not arise.

¶120

It is stated that the present Applicant is the only affected party to the proceeding under IA No. 522 of 2021 and, hence, may be permitted.

¶121

IA/195(AHM)2024 is an application filed by the sole Financial Creditor with the following prayers:-

¶122

(A) This Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to allow the present interlocutory application in the interest of justice,

¶123

(B) This Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 to release the amount of Rs.1,31,19,769.08 in favour of the applicant herein being Financial Creditor and Sole CoC member.

¶124

(C) To order the cost of this Application.

¶125

(D) To grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶126

The Applicant has narrated the facts which are briefly as per the prayer in the Inv. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and for the sake of brevity, the same is not discussed herein.

¶127

We have heard Ld. Counsel for the Parties in above all three IAs and perused the record.

¶128

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶129

13 of 16

¶130

The Resolution Applicant has brought in the entire amount. It is stated by the counsels appearing for the RP that possession of the Corporate Debtor has been given to the Resolution Applicant M/s. Naresh Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., long back post the approval of the Resolution Plan vide order dated 29.06.2022. The only controversy in the matter relates to the distribution of a sum of Rs.1,31,19,769.08.

¶131

Civil Appeal No. 1661 of 2020 was decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court on 06.09.2022 whereas it is seen that the Resolution Plan with respect to the Corporate Debtor (herein) was approved on 29.06.2022. The order dated 13.12.2022 records that the RP has kept that amount separately and till today the same has not been distributed. On the other hand, the State Tax Department is claiming to be a Secured Creditor. At this stage, we refer to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 1661 of 2020, more particularly, in para 54 to 58 which are reproduced below:-

¶132

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶133

14 of 16

¶134

“54. In our considered view, the Committee of Creditors, which might include financial institutions and other financial creditors, cannot secure their own dues at the cost of statutory dues owed to any Government or Governmental Authority or for that matter, any other dues.

¶135

55. In our considered view, the NCLAT clearly erred in its observation that Section 53 of the IBC over-rides Section 48 of the GVAT Act. Section 53 of the IBC begins with a non-obstante clause which reads :-

¶136

“Not withstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law enacted by the Parliament or any State Legislature for the time being in force, the proceeds from the sale of the liquidation assets shall be distributed in the following order of priority...........”

¶137

56. Section 48 of the GVAT Act is not contrary to or inconsistent with Section 53 or any other provisions of the IBC. Under Section 53(1)(b)(ii), the debts owed to a secured creditor, which would include the State under the GVAT Act, are to rank equally with other specified debts including debts on account of workman’s dues for a period of 24 months preceding the liquidation commencement date.

¶138

57. As observed above, the State is a secured creditor under the GVAT Act. Section 3(30) of the IBC defines secured creditor to mean a creditor in favour of whom security interest is credited. Such security interest could be created by operation of law. The definition of secured creditor in the IBC does not exclude any Government or Governmental Authority.

¶139

58. We are constrained to hold that the Appellate Authority (NCLAT) and the Adjudicating Authority erred in law in rejecting the application/appeal of the appellant. As observed above, delay in filing a claim cannot be the sole ground for rejecting the claim..”.

¶140

The said judgment was upheld in Review Petition

¶141

(Civil) No. 1620 of 2023 on 31.10.2023 by the Hon’ble

¶142

Supreme Court.

¶143

IA/522(AHM)2021, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 in CP(IB) 72(AHM)2018 In the matter of : STERLING LAM LTD.

¶144

15 of 16

¶145

Since, the amount of Rs.1,31,19,769.08 has not been distributed, we hold that the same may be distributed to the various claimants treating the State Tax Department as the Secured Creditors in terms of provisions as contained in Section 53 of IBC, 2016 within seven days and compliance may be reported by way of additional affidavit by the RP.

¶146

The other two IAs, namely, Int. Pet/2(AHM)2024 and IA/195(AHM)2024 deal with the same issues. As we have already decided in the main issue in IA/522(AHM)2021, these two applications are hereby dismissed.

¶147