Allowed

In the matter of Supersonic Dealcom Private Limited I.A No. 1089-KB-2022 In C.P (I.B) No. 04-KB-2020

For Cases: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code – 2016 – Liquidation

NCLT10 Feb 2023

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed the Resolution Professional's application for liquidation of Supersonic Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. and appointed the RP as liquidator, ordering the cessation of Board powers and vesting control in the Liquidator despite meagre assets.

What did the court decide?

Applicant appointed as liquidator; liquidation process initiated; Board powers ceased and vested in liquidator; public notice issued; no suits instituted without approval.

In the matter of Supersonic Dealcom Private Limited I.A… — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | NCLT (2023)

¶1

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNANL KOLKATA BENCH (Court-II) KOLKATA

¶2

I.A No. 1089/KB/2022

¶3

¶4

C.P (I.B) No. 04/KB/2020

¶5

An Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016;

¶6

In the matter of:

¶7

Arvinder Singh

¶8

….Operational Creditor

¶9

And

¶10

Supersonic Dealcom Private Limited

¶11

CIN: U51109WB2007PTC113832

…. Corporate Debtor

And

In the matter of

An application under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

¶16

And

¶17

In the matter of:

¶18

Santanu Bhattacharjee

¶19

… Resolution Professional/Applicant

¶20

Order Pronounced on : 10 February 2023

¶21

Coram:

¶22

Shri Rohit Kapoor, Member (Judicial) Shri Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical) Appearances (via video conferencing / Physical)

¶23

Ms. Urmila Chakraborty, Adv. : For RP Mr. Saurav Jain, Adv.

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

Per: Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical)

¶26

The Court convened through hybrid mode.

¶27

This is an application filed by Resolution Professional appointed to carry out the CIRP in respect of Corporate Debtor viz Supersonic Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. by an Operational Creditor namely Sri Arvinder Singh who is carrying on business under the trade name and style of M/s A.B. Singh & Associates, in the sole proprietorship from his office at SCO: 59-60 Phase 3B2 SAS Nagar Mohali.

¶28

The application seeks an order of liquidation against the Corporate Debtor as the CoC in its wisdom has decided not to carry on with the process of CIRP considering meagre assets of the Corporate Debtor.

¶29

The CIRP was initiated on 20/04/2022 and one Mr. Debasis Bhattacherjee was appointed as Insolvency Resolution Professional whereupon a public announcement was made as per Regulation 6 of CIRP Regulations in Form A and was published in two newspapers as required under the Statute.

¶30

In connection with the above, IRP also sent the detailed list of documents and information required to run the CIRP process in a time bound manner to the Suspended Board of Directors through e-mail. Thereafter, the IRP in the very first meeting of the CoC on 19/05/2022 expressed his wish to be discharged from the engagement as RP from the case considering his poor health condition.

¶31

Subsequently, the CoC passed a resolution for replacement of Mr. Debasis Bhattacharya and appointment of Mr. Santanu Bhattacharjee as the RP. This appointment was confirmed by this Adjudicating Authority on 30^th June, 2022 whereafter the RP conducted CoC meetings from time to time to discuss and deliberate all possibilities of reviving the Corporate Debtor. He also has submitted progress reports from time to time before this Tribunal to update ongoing CIRP.

¶32

In the 2^nd Meeting of the CoC, a proposal was put forth by the RP to publish Form-G and finalize the eligibility criteria. However, the CoC which comprises of only 1 Member who is himself the petitioner that is Operational Creditor decided not to issue the Form-G or appoint in transaction/Forensic Auditor as required under the law.

¶33

The RP then appointed two valuers as per provisions of IBBI Regulations 2015 and it was discerned that the only fair value and liquidation value was 1,64,964/-. Keeping

¶34

Page 2 of 4

¶35

in view this meagre valuation of the company, it was resolved by the CoC in the 4^th Meeting to file an application before this Adjudicating Authority for the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor followed by early dissolution as per Regulation 14 of the IBBI Regulations (liquidation process) which is the subject matter of the current application.

¶36

This is a predicament before this authority that despite having the information about the meagre assets of the Corporate Debtor which are ex-facie not going to be sufficient even to meet the liquidation cost of the Corporate Debtor, still in order to follow the laid down process of law more expenditure has to be incurred thus further eroding value of the Corporate Debtor.

¶37

Be that as it may, we allow the prayer of the applicant to liquidate the Corporate Debtor in the manner laid down under Section 33(5) and also as detailed in the IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016.

¶38

This Bench, therefore, hereby orders as follows:-

¶39

a. Sri. Santanu Bhattacharjee IBBI /IPA – 001/IP – P01141/2018-2019/11868

¶40

has already given his consent for acting as a liquidator is appointed as a liquidator for the Corporate Debtor.

¶41

b. The Liquidator shall initiate liquidation process as envisaged under Chapter-III of the Code and the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

¶42

c. Public Notice shall be issued in the same newspapers in which advertisements were issued earlier, stating that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation.

¶43

d. All the powers of the Board of Directors, and of key managerial persons, shall cease to exist in accordance with section 34(2) of the Code. All these powers shall henceforth vest in the Liquidator.

¶44

e. The personnel of the Corporate Debtor are directed to extend all assistance and co-operation to the Liquidator as required by him in managing the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor.

¶45

f. On initiation of the liquidation process but subject to section 52 of the Code, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted by or against the Corporate Debtor save and except the liberty to the liquidator to institute suit or other legal proceeding on behalf of the Corporate Debtor with prior approval of this

¶46

Page 3 of 4

¶47

Adjudicating Authority, as provided in section 33(5) of the Code read with its proviso.

¶48

g. In accordance with section 33(7) of the Code, this liquidation order shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the Corporate Debtor except to the extent of the business of the Corporate Debtor continued during the liquidation process by the Liquidator.

¶49

h. In terms of section 33(1)(b)(iii), the Liquidator shall file a copy of this Order with the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal , within whose jurisdiction the Corporate Debtor is registered. Additionally, the Registry shall also forward a copy of this Order to the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal.

¶50

i. The application bearing IA(IBC)/1089(KB)2022 shall stand disposed of in accordance with the above directions.

¶51

j. CP(IB)/04(KB)2020 is to come up for filing of periodical report on 11.04.2023

¶52

k. The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties and their Ld. Counsel for information and for taking necessary steps.

¶53

l. Certified Copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶54

Balraj Joshi Rohit Kapoor Member (Technical) Member (Judicial

¶55

Order signed on the 10^th day of February 2023.

¶56

Page 4 of 4

In the matter of Supersonic Dealcom Private Limited I.A No. 1089-KB-2022 In C.P (I.B) No. 04-KB-2020

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

In the matter of Supersonic Dealcom Private Limited I.A No. 1089-KB-2022 In C.P (I.B) No. 04-KB-2020

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases