no agreement was executed, and the applicant has not provided any copy of the agreement, if any executed. On the contrary, the Applicant had issued a notice dated 10.04.2018 seeking vacation of the premises, and thereafter another notice dated 1.12.2018 was issued demanding payment of Rs. 19,64,604.17 towards outstanding rental dues/license fee till 30.10.18. These dues remained unpaid as on date of commencement of CIRP i.e. 25.09.2019 and the premises was still in occupation and use of the Corporate Debtor. It is further submitted that while the Premises may be non-operational for some time, the Premises continue to hold inventory of the Corporate Debtor and its subsidiaries of over Rs. 30 crores in value, and the substantial cost would have to be incurred by the RP in case said inventory has to be shifted to another location. It is also submitted that while he had reached out to arrive at a mutually acceptable commercially acceptable rental/license arrangement for the period of occupation by the Corporate Debtor of the Premises during the CIRP, however, the Applicant has been unreasonably insisting on escalations and interest amounts which were not mutually agreed. It was also submitted that no invoice was raised by the Applicant claiming the license fee, and on account of expiry of leave & license agreement, he could not verify the claim of the applicant for the period after expiry of such agreement. Further, the RP has contended that the claim can not be considered as the application for approval for Resolution Plan has already been filed.
