Allowed

In the matter of Lorange Design and Retail Pirivate Limited [Ia 2836-2023 in C.P. (IB)-4448(MB)2018]

NCLT7 Jul 2023IA 2836-2023 in C.P. (IB)-4448(MB)2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed an operational creditor's application to withdraw the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against Lorange Design & Retail Pvt. Ltd. after finding the debtor had no assets or going-concern value. The court directed the IRP to refund unspent costs to the creditor. The debtor was released from the moratorium.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the CIRP initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and release of the corporate debtor from the moratorium. Director shall refund unutilized interim costs to the operatio

In the matter of Lorange Design and Retail Pirivate… — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | NCLT (2023)

¶1

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL COURT-I, MUMBAI BENCH

¶2

Item 4

¶3

IA 2836/2023 IN C.P. (IB)/4448(MB)2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

MS. ANU JAGMOHAN SINGH HON’BLE MEMBER (T)

¶6

SHRI H.V. SUBBA RAO HON’BLE MEMBER(J)

¶7

ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 07.07.2023

¶8

NAME OF THE PARTIES : -

¶9

SETU ADVERTISING PVT LTD

¶10

¶11

LORANGE DESIGN & RETAIL PVT. LTD.

¶12

IBC Under Sec 9 Sec. 12A

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Mr. Manoj Mishra Ld. Counsel appearing for the RP is present.

¶15

IA 2836/2023

¶16

The present Interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/Operational creditor for withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process which was ordered vide an order of this Bench dt. 06.06.2023. Record reveals that, the matter was admitted and Mr. Anil Seetaram Vaidya was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor.

¶17

The applicant carried out all the diligences and compliances including issuing a public announcement on 09.06.2023. inviting claims from Creditor till 21.06.2023. In response to the public announcement, the Applicant has received only a single claim to the extent of Rs. 27,98,252/- from M/s. Setu Advertising Private Limited, being the Operational Creditor.

¶18

On 08.06.2023, the applicant along with his team paid a visit to the

¶19

registered address of the Corporate Debtor at Pune, however, the said address is occupied by one. K.K. Nag Private Limited, which was also informed by K.K. Nag private Limited vide letter dated 08.06.2023. After various follows ups with the ROC and the suspended director, a suspended director, Ms. Roheena Nagpal, informed to the applicant via mail on 15.06.2023, that the registered office of the Corporate Debtor at Pune was on leave and license basis and had got terminated long back in the year 2019. Therefore, since the Corporate Debtor had already closed operations from 2018-2019, no alternate premises were taken by the Corporate Debtor.

¶20

As on the Insolvency Commencement Date the Corporate Debtor is neither in possession of any tangible or recoverable assets nor is a going concern since its operations have been closed from 2018-2019. In view of the same, the prospect of an Expression of Interest by a Prospective Resolution Applicant appears dim. Since, there is no liquidation estate to distribute, even during the Liquidation period there is a minimal possibility of any recovery/realization of the amount as claimed by the Operational Creditor.

¶21

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid reasons and circumstances, prior to the constitution of Committee of Creditors on 27.06.2023. the Applicant is in receipt of a Letter and Form FA from M/s. Setu Advertising Private Limited, wherein the Operational Creditor has expressed its concern that it wants to close the CIRP process and withdraw the matter at the earliest.

¶22

In response to the query raised by this Bench with regard to the fees of the

¶23

IRP, the counsel appearing for the IRP Mr. Manoj Mishra submits that the Operational Creditor has paid Rs. 3,00,000/- as initial CIRP cost as ordered by this Tribunal in the order and accordingly he has appropriated the same towards fees and expenses. When this Bench raised query as to how much expenditure he has incurred for paper publication etc., he could not show proper proof of expenditure and therefore this Bench reasonably estimated the expenditure with the consent of the counsel appearing for the RP at Rs. 75,000/- and a reasonable fee of RP at Rs. 1,00,000/- since he has not done anything except issuing paper publication inviting claims. Hence, this Bench hereby directs the IRP to refund back Rs. 1,25,000/- to the Operational Creditor through any authenticated mode of transfer within one week from the date of uploading of the order and shall file compliance affidavit before the Registrar failing which the conduct of IRP will be intimated to the IBBI.

¶24

Accordingly, the above application is allowed by withdrawing the CIRP Order dated 06.06.2023 and by releasing Corporate Debtor from all the rigours of moratorium.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

ANU JAGMOHAN SINGH Member (Technical)

¶28

H.V. SUBBA RAO

¶29

Member (Judicial)

¶30

Jagdish

In the matter of Lorange Design and Retail Pirivate Limited [Ia 2836-2023 in C.P. (IB)-4448(MB)2018]

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

In the matter of Lorange Design and Retail Pirivate Limited [Ia 2836-2023 in C.P. (IB)-4448(MB)2018]

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases