Allowed

In the matter of Digicable Networks (India) Limited I.A. No. 991 of 2022 in C.P. No. 297 of 2019

NCLT12 Jan 2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The NCLT approved a Resolution Plan submitted by Mr. Madhav Dhir for DIGICABLE NETWORK (INDIA) LIMITED. The Plan was voted in favor by 100% of the Committee of Creditors. The Bench held that the plan was feasible, viable, and compliant with legal provisions under the IBC, granting permission for its implementation and releasing the corporate debtor from statutory dues not included in the plan.

What did the court decide?

The Application for approval of the Resolution Plan was allowed. The Resolution Plan submitted by Mr. Madhav Dhir is approved, has been given effect from the date of the order, and binds the corporate

In the matter of Digicable Networks (India) Limited I.A… — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | NCLT (2023)

¶1

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III

¶2

I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN

¶3

C.P. No. 297 of 2019

¶4

In the matter of an Application under Section 30(6) and Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016

¶5

In the matter of AXIS BANK LIMITED

¶6

… Financial Creditor

¶7

v/s

¶8

DIGICABLE NETWORK (INDIA) LIMITED

¶9

... Corporate Debtor

¶10

I.A. No. 991/2022

¶11

MR. SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF CORPORATE DEBTOR DIGICABLE NETWORK (INDIA) LIMITED

¶12

…Applicant/Resolution Professional

¶13

Reserved for orders on: 02.01.2023 Order pronounced on: 12.01.2023

¶14

Coram:

¶15

Hon’ble Shri H. V. Subba Rao, Member (Judicial)

¶16

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶17

Hon’ble Smt. Madhu Sinha, Member (Technical)

¶18

Appearance (through video conferencing):

¶19

For the Applicant: Mr. Karan Grover, Advocate for Resolution

¶20

Professional

¶21

Per: H. V. Subba Rao, Member (Judicial)

¶22

This is an Application filed under Section 30(6) and Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’) filed by the Resolution Professional seeking approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant Mr. Madhav Dhir, which was approved by 100% voting share of the members of the Committee of Creditors (hereinafter referred to as ‘COC’).

¶23

The facts leading to the Application are as under:

¶24

a. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as ‘CIRP’) of the Corporate Debtor was initiated by this Bench by an order dated 04.12.2020 under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) (Admission Order) and Mr. Sunil Kumar Choudhary was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as ‘IRP’). Subsequently an application for correcting the name of the IRP was filed before this tribunal, thereby this Tribunal vide Order, dated 23.02.2021, appointed Mr. Anil Mehta as the Interim Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as ‘IRP’), who was subsequently confirmed as the Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as ‘RP’) by the Committee of Creditors (hereinafter referred to as ‘CoC’) in its 1^st Meeting held on 17.04.2021.

¶25

Page 2 of 34

¶26

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶27

b. The RP published an invitation for Expression of Interest (hereinafter referred to as ‘EOI’) by Prospective Resolution Applicant (hereinafter referred to as ‘PRA’) on 13.09.2021, for submission of Resolution Plan in respect of the Corporate Debtor. As no EOI was received, in view of queries received from Prospective EOI applicants, the RP extended the last date of submission of EOI and another Invitation for Expression of Interest was published by the RP on 29.09.2021.

¶28

c. Pursuant to the above publications, the RP received EOI from 4 (four) PRAs, however on request of 1 (one) PRA the last date of submission of Resolution Plan was extended from 29.11.2021 to 13.12.2021.

¶29

d. On 26.11.2021 through an Assignment Agreement Axis Bank Limited assigned its Financial Debt in favour of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Limited which was accordingly inducted as a member of the CoC in place of Axis Bank Limited by the RP.

¶30

e. The CoC in its 9^th CoC Meeting held on 13.12.2021, resolved to replace the present Resolution Professional, Mr. Anil Mehta with Mr. Shamsher Bahadur Singh. An Interlocutory Application No. 29/2022, seeking replacement of the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor was allowed on 17.01.2022. Therefore, Mr. Shamsher Bahadur Singh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’) appointed as the Resolution Professional.

¶31

f. Further, on request from 2 (two) PRAs for extending the last date of submission of the Resolution Plan, the CoC in its 11^th Meeting held on 31.01.2022 resolved to grant time till 07.02.2022, for submission of the Resolution Plan.

¶32

g. The Applicant submits the claims received and admitted by Resolution Professional as under:

¶33

Page 3 of 34

¶34

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶35

	Summary of Clai	ms (Amount in Lak	hs)
Sr. No.	Class of Creditor	Amount Claimed	Amount Admitted
Secure	d Financial Creditors
1	Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited	20,611.54	20,611.54
2	Reliance Commercial Financial Limited	5,379.63	5,379.63
Total S	ecured Financial Creditors	25,991.17	25,991.17
Unsecu	red Financial Creditors
3	Stellar Interactive Media Pvt. Ltd.	55,133.13
4	Broadband Pacenet (India) Pvt. Ltd.	9,656.07
Total U	nsecured Financial Creditors	64,789.20
Total F	inancial Creditors	90,780.38	25,991.17
Operat	ional Creditors
5	Employees/ Workmen	977.07
Liabilit	ies as per Balance Sheet as at	March 3, 2019
7	Provident Fund	75.34
8	ESI	12.07
9	Any other – Professional Tax	0.18
Total O	perational Creditors	87.59

¶36

*Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited has taken over the debt of Axis Bank Limited and now Secured Financial Creditors in the book of Corporate Debtor.

¶37

The CoC decided to appoint valuers Crest Valuation Services Private Limited and Resolute Valuers and Consultants Private Limited respectively to determine the fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor, as required under Regulation 27 of the IBBI (IRP for

¶38

Page 4 of 34

¶39

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶40

Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. These valuers had submitted their reports. The Liquidation and Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor is as follows:

¶41

Fair Value	Liquidation Value
Rs. 334.47 Crores	Rs.246.66 Crores

¶42

The Applicant states that the COC in its Meeting decided that an advertisement for inviting EOI be issued. Form G inviting EOI was published on 01.06.2021. The last date for submission of expression of interest from prospective resolution applicants was 13.09.2021 which was further extended till 29.09.2021 and submission of plan was 29.11.2021, which was further extended number of times and 07.02.2022 was the final last date of submission of Resolution Plan.

¶43

The Applicant further states that in furtherance of the Form-G issued by applicant, he received EOIs from 2 (two) Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs) within the stipulated time period. Below are the names of the prospective resolution applicant:

¶44

a. Mr. Madhav Dhir and;

¶45

b. Shiva Consultants Private Limited.

¶46

The Applicant submits that, during the 13^th Meeting of COC held on 22.03.2022 and subsequently deferred to 23.03.2022 and 24.03.2022, the proposed Resolution Plans were evaluated on the basis of the evaluation matrix. The resolution passed, and it was declared that the plan submitted by the Mr. Madhav Dhir was approved.

¶47

The COC in its 13^th meeting held on 24.03.2022 considered the final Resolution Plan of Mr. Madhav Dhir and approved the Plan with a

¶48

Page 5 of 34

¶49

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶50

voting share of 100%. Thereafter, the Applicant issued compliance certificate in Form “H” was issued by the Resolution professional.

¶51

8. The Salient Features of the Resolution Plan are as under:

¶52

a. Mr. Madhav Dhir, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Successful Resolution Applicant’) (SRA), The Resolution Applicant is an individual who holds a Master’s Degree in Economics and Strategy for Business from the Imperial College London and B.Sc (Hons.) Management degree from the University of Warwick. He is highly regarded strategic business development and management expert. He also owns and manages Lords Chloro Alkali Limited, a listed company operating a 250 TPD Caustic Soda plant at Alwar, Rajasthan (“LCAL”). As an Executive Director on LCAL’s Board, he supervises the activities of the LCAL. The SRA also made an open offer and acquired a fund, listed on AIM segment of London Stock Exchange which has been investing in distressed assets in India since 2012. Recently, he made an open offer to consolidate 75% of the shareholding of Lordo Chloro Alkali Limited which is public company listed on BSE.

¶53

b. The Digicable Network (India) Limited the Corporate Debtor (hereinafter referred to as ‘DNIL’) was incorporated on 01.06.2007 and have its registered office situated at A-wing, 602, Everest Grande Building, Opp. Ahura Centre, Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra. DNIL was engaged in the business of Cable Television Services, Digital Cable Television Services and A multiple-system operator (MSO) Services.

¶54

Page 6 of 34

¶55

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶56

c. Cancellation of Existing Shareholding and Issue of fresh

¶57

Equity Shares : Immediately after Effective Date, all the existing shares of Corporate Debtor shall stand cancelled without any payment to existing shareholders. Corporate Debtor shall issue to the Resolution Applicant such number of equity shares as may be suitable on the basis of capital structure requirement of the Corporate Debtor. In terms of the circular (ref IBC/01/2017) dated 25^th October, 2017, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India, approval of the erstwhile shareholders of the Corporate Debtor to the transaction contemplated under the instant Resolution Plan, including the transfer/extinguishment of the entire existing share capital, shall deemed to have been given without any further act and deed immediately upon sanction of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority.

¶58

d. Monitoring and Implementation of Resolution Plan:

¶59

For successful implementation of Resolution Plan, a Monitoring Committee ( “MC” ) is being proposed by Resolution Applicant which will come into force on the date of approval of Resolution Plan, which shall have following members:

¶60

(a) 1 (one) Insolvency Professional;

¶61

(b) 1 (one) Representative of the Resolution Applicant and;

¶62

(c) 1 (one) from Financial Creditors of the Corporate Debtor. This committee shall continue the operations of the Corporate Debtor till the Effective Date when control and management of the Corporate Debtor will be handed over to the Resolution Applicant. Thereafter the Monitoring Committee will supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan as per the provisions contained herein.

¶63

The Cost of the Monitoring Committee would be paid by the

¶64

Page 7 of 34

¶65

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶66

Resolution Applicant on actual basis as may be negotiated/ settled by mutual consent.

¶67

After making of upfront payment, issuance of Equity Shares and Zero Cost Debentures (‘ZCDs’), and handing over management and control of the Corporate Debtor, including its Assets and Properties on the Effective Date, the Monitoring Committee shall accordingly stand dissolved.

¶68

e. Effective Date (E) : “Effective Date” means the date on which the management and control of the Corporate Debtor, including its Assets and Properties, is taken over by the Resolution Applicant or 90 (ninety) days from the NCLT Approval date, whichever is later.

¶69

f. The Resolution Plan proposes a total Consideration of Rs. 22,937.59/- (in Lakhs) (Rupees Twenty Two Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand).

¶70

9. The details of the proposed payments are as follows:

¶71

A) CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS COSTS

¶72

i. The CIRP Costs are Rs. 300.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Three Hundred Lakhs only).

¶73

ii. The Resolution Applicant proposes that CIRP Costs be paid in full and in priority to any Claim of any other creditor on the Effective Date.

¶74

iii. In case the CIRP costs exceed the amount of Rs. 300.00/Lakhs (Rupees Three Hundred Lakhs only), then the excess amount shall be adjusted from the resolution amount proposed to Secured Financial Creditors on proportionate basis to admitted claims.

¶75

Page 8 of 34

¶76

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶77

iv. If the CIRP cost is below Rs. 300.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Three Hundred Lakhs only) then excess amount shall be transferred to Secured Financial Creditors on proportionate basis to their admitted claims.

¶78

B) FINANCIAL CREDITORS

¶79

Proposal for Secured Financial Creditor

¶80

The aggregate claim of the Secured Financial Creditors is Rs. 25,991.17/- Lakhs (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety One Lakhs and Seventeen Thousand only).

¶81

The Resolution Applicant proposed an upfront payment of Rs. 1,500.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Fifteen Hundred Lakhs only) to be paid to the Secured Financial Creditors on the basis of their admitted claims within a period of 90 (ninety) days from the date of Approval of the Plan.

¶82

The Resolution Applicant proposed a deferred payment of Rs. 6,600.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Six Thousand Six Hundred Lakhs only) to Financial Creditors on pro-data basis in full and final settlement of their claims / dues / debt within 36 (thirty six) months from Effective Date.

¶83

The Resolution Applicant proposed issuance of Zero Coupon Debentures (ZCDs) within 90 (ninety) days of Approval Date, aggregating to Rs. 10,400.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Ten Thousand Four Hundred Lakhs only), on the basis of claims of Secured Financial Creditors towards of full and final settlement of all their claim/ debt/ dues against the Corporate Debtor.

¶84

Within 90 (ninety) days of the Approval date, the Resolution Applicant proposes that the Corporate Debtor will issue Equity Shares having Face Value of Rs. 1,500.00/- Lakhs

¶85

Page 9 of 34

¶86

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶87

(Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred Lakhs only) to the Secured Financial Creditors.

¶88

The respective share of the Secured Financial Creditors in the Deferred Payment, issuance of Zero Coupon Debentures (ZCDs) will be as per the following payment schedule:

¶89

(in Lakhs)

¶90

Timeline of Redemption /	Alchemist Asset	Reliance	Total
Buyback by Resolution	Reconstruction	Commercial
Applicant / Nominees	Company Limited (‘AARC’)	Finance Limited (‘RCFL’)
Upfront – Within 90 Days of NCL	T Approval Date
Upfront Payment	1,189.53	310.47	1,500.00
Issuance of Equity Shares	1,189.53	310.47	1,500.00
Deferred Payment Installment
Within 12 Months from Effective Date – Deferred Payment - 1	1,744.65	455.35	2,200.00
Within 24 Months from Effective Date – Deferred Payment - 2	1,744.65	455.35	2,200.00
Within 36 Months from Effective Date – Deferred Payment - 3	1,744.65	455.35	2,200.00
ZCDs Redemption / Buyback by	the RA / or its no	minees
Within 48 Months from Effective
Date – ZCDs Redemption/	3,489.29	910.71	4,400.00
Buyback
Within 60 Months from Effective
Date – ZCDs Redemption/ Buyback	4,759.13	1,241.87	6,000.00
Total	15,860.42	4,139.58	20,000.00

¶91

*SFC shall have right to Redeem/ buyback the ZCDs before the above timeline with NPV calculated on the basis of

¶92

Page 10 of 34

¶93

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶94

discount rates mentioned in the Request For Resolution Plan (‘RFRP’) i.e., 12% for one year, 13% for year 2 and 3, 15% for year 4 and 5 and 20% thereafter.

¶95

The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay to the Dissenting Financial Creditors such amounts as are prescribed under Section 30(2)(b) of the Code and in such manner as laid down under Regulation 38(1) of the CIRP Regulations. In this regard, the Secured Financial Creditors who abstains from voting, shall also be considered as Dissenting Secured Financial Creditor. The payments to be made to Dissenting Secured Financial Creditors will be made as per the payment schedule given in the Resolution Plan in preference to the payment to the assenting Financial Creditors and payment towards assenting Financial Creditors will commence only upon complete payment of Dissenting Financial Creditors.

¶96

Proposal for Unsecured Financial Creditor

¶97

The aggregate claim of the Secured Financial Creditors is Rs. 64,789.20/- Lakhs (Rupees Sixty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Nine Lakhs and Twenty Thousand only).

¶98

The Resolution Applicant states that as per the information memorandum provided by the Resolution Professional, there is no Unsecured Financial Creditor of the Corporate Debtor. However, there are two Unsecured Financial Creditors are related party of the Corporate Debtor hence their claims are not admitted by the Resolution Professional. The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay NIL amount to such Unsecured Financial Creditor the related parties of the Corporate Debtor, in full and final settlement of their claims/ debt/ dues.

¶99

Page 11 of 34

¶100

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶101

C) PROPOSAL FOR OPERATIONAL CREDITOR

¶102

Provision as per Applicable Law/ IBC – The Resolution Professional shall examine each Resolution Plan received by him to confirm that each Resolution Plan provides for the payment of debts of Operational Creditors in such manner as may be specified by the Board which shall not be less than:

¶103

The amount to be paid to such Creditors in the event of a Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 53; or

¶104

The amount that would have been paid to such Creditors, if the amount to be distributed under the Resolution Plan had been distributed in accordance with the order of priority in sub-section (1) of Section 53, whichever is higher, and provides for the payment of debts of Financial Creditors, who do not vote in favour of the Resolution Plan, in such manner as may be specified by the Board, which shall not be less than the amount to be paid to such creditors in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 53 in the event of a Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

¶105

Claims of Workmen and Employees

¶106

As per the data provided by the Resolution Professional, the

¶107

claims filed by the Operational Creditors are as follows:

¶108

Sr. No.	Type of Operational Creditors	Claims Amount (INR in Lakh)	Admitted Amount (INR in Lakh)
	Claims received from
1	Workmen & Employees	641.22	494.73
	(FORM D)
2	Claims received from representatives of	1091.51	949.18

¶109

Page 12 of 34

¶110

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶111

	Workmen	&	Employees
	(FORM E)
Tota	l			1732.73	1443.91

¶112

The aggregate claim of the Workmen and Employees is Rs. 1,732.73/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Two Lakhs and Seventy Three Thousand only) whereas the claim admitted is Rs. 1,443.91/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand Four Hundred Forty Three Lakhs and Ninety One Thousand only).

¶113

The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay an amount of Rs. 50.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) to those Workers and Employees who are eligible as per IB Code 2016 [12 (twelve) months and 24 (twenty four) months from ICD respectively for employees and workers], subject to verification and admission of the claims by the Resolution Professional, in proportion of their admitted claims in full and final settlement of their claims. No claim of any other Employees/ Workmen/ Officer of the Corporate Debtor will be entertained by the Resolution Applicant. In case any amount is required to be paid to any of the Employees/ Officer/ Workmen of the Corporate Debtor over and above the amount of Rs. 50.00 /- Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) provided in this Resolution Plan the same shall be covered within the overall limit of Rs. 50.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) provided for payment to the Workmen/ Employees on proportionate basis. However, in case if any amount is attributable/ payable as per the terms of the IBC towards above mentioned Operational Creditors more than Rs. 50.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) provided for,

¶114

Page 13 of 34

¶115

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶116

such amount shall be adjustable from the Resolution Amount proposed to Secured Financial Creditors and shall be distributed in accordance with the order of priority as per Section 30(2) read with Regulation 38 of CIRP Regulation along with the Section 53 of the IBC. In case amount payable towards claims of Employees or Workers are less than the proposed amount of Rs. 50.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) then additional/ full amount shall be distributed to Secured Financial Creditors on the basis of their admitted claims.

¶117

Provisions as per balance sheet dated March 31, 2019

¶118

It is stated that as per the information memorandum, following provision has been made in the balance sheet as on March 31, 2019:

¶119

Sr. No.	Particulars	INR in Lakh
1	Provident Fund	75.34
2	ESI	12.07
3	Other – (Professional Tax)	0.18
Total		87.59

¶120

The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay an unpaid part of above mentioned liabilities and set aside Rs. 87.59/- Lakhs (Rupees Eighty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand only) towards provisioning provided in the balance sheet as on March 31, 2019 in full and final settlement. No other provisioning whether mentioned in the Balance Sheet/ Information Memorandum or not will be entertained by the Resolution Applicant in this regard. However, in case if any amount attributable/ payable as per terms of the IBC

¶121

Page 14 of 34

¶122

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶123

towards above mentioned Operational Creditors is more than Rs. 87.59/- Lakh (Rupees Eighty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand only) provided for, such amount shall be adjustable from the Resolution Amount proposed to Secured Financial Creditors and shall be distributed in accordance with the order of priority as per Section 30(2) read with Regulation 38 of CIRP Regulation along with the Section 53 of the IBC.

¶124

In case the amount payable towards above mentioned provisioning is less than the proposed amount of Rs. 87.59/- Lakh (Rupees Eighty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand only) then excess amount shall be distributed to Secured Financial Creditors on the basis of their admitted claims.

¶125

Operational Creditors relating to all Statutory / Government Liabilities –

¶126

1.The Resolution Professional has not informed the Resolution Applicant about the Liquidation Value of the Corporate Debtor as per the provisions of the Code and CIRP Regulations, however as per the estimates of the Resolution Applicant the Liquidation Value of the Corporate Debtor in any case shall not be sufficient to repay the debt of even the Secured Financial Creditors and therefore, the liquidation value applicable to Operational Creditors in terms of sub clauses (i) and (ii) to section 30(2)(b) as mentioned above, would in all likelihood be NIL.

¶127

As such, the Resolution Applicant proposes to pay NIL Amount to all Statutory/ Government Labilities in full and final settlement of all their dues/ claims. Further, it is

¶128

Page 15 of 34

¶129

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶130

clarified that upon approval of this Resolution Plan by this Tribunal, all the Statutory/ Government liabilities (if any) relating to the period upto the Effective Date (whether assessed or not assessed, disputed or undisputed, disclosed or undisclosed, reflected in the Balance Sheet or not) in relation to dues of whatever nature due to any Tax Authorities including Entertainment Tax, Property Tax, Entry Tax, Sales Tax, GST, VAT, Income Tax, MAT, Service Tax, Custom Duty or any other tax or duty or cess as applicable to the Corporate Debtor, any State Govt., Central Govt., Semi Government, Public Sector Undertaking; Development Authorities, Development Bodies or any other local Municipal Corporation/ Authorities, whether specifically mentioned in this Resolution Plan or not; with regard to which, the claims have been filed/ not filed/ verified/ not verified/ admitted or not; shall stand terminated/ waived/ written off and extinguished in full and no liability/ dues shall be payable by the Corporate Debtor/ Resolution Applicant to these Creditors/ Claimants.

¶131

However, in case if any amount is attributable/ payable towards all Statutory/ Government Liabilities, such amount shall be adjustable from the Resolution Amount proposed to Secured Financial Creditors and shall be distributed in accordance with the order of priority as per Section 30(2) read with Regulation 38 of CIRP Regulation along with the Section 53 of the IBC.

¶132

Furthermore, as per Section 32(A) of IBC, immunity shall be deemed to have been granted to CD from all liability of the Corporate Debtor under all Applicable Laws for any

¶133

Page 16 of 34

¶134

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶135

non-compliance by the Corporate Debtor or its Directors/ Management etc. for the period prior to the Insolvency Commencement Date (‘ICD’).

¶136

Subject to Section 32(A) of IBC, if any interest/ penal implications arise, due to such non-compliance/ default/ breach in relation to any period prior to the NCLT Approval Date, these shall stand terminated/ waived/ written off/ extinguished in full. The Corporate Debtor and the Resolution Applicant/ or its Nominees/ its Officers shall not be liable for any penal provision arising out of the act of the previous management.

¶137

D) TREATMENT OF SECURITY AND CORPORATE/ PERSONAL GUARANTEE PROVIDED BY THE CORPORTAE DEBTOR/ PROMOTERS/ THEIR NOMINEES

¶138

It is submitted that by virtue of the NCLT Approval Order, on the Effective Date, all assets of Corporate Debtor, and collaterals owned by Corporate Debtor that are subject to any encumbrance, security, collaterals and/or lien favour of lenders/ Creditors by whatever name called shall stand free and clear of all encumbrances. This would inter alia include the security mentioned in the Information Memorandum relating to the Corporate Debtor issued by the Interim Resolution Professional/ Resolution Professional as amended from time to time whether recorded in the Balance Sheets of the Corporate Debtor or not.

¶139

The Financial Creditors who are beneficiaries of Personal Guarantee and Corporate Guarantee (issued by any entity other than the Corporate Debtor) will be entitled to enforce

¶140

Page 17 of 34

¶141

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶142

the same at their own cost, risk and consequences and will be entitled to the proceeds recovered from the same on prorata basis. The Resolution Applicant takes no responsibility for enforcement and/ or recovery from the Personal Guarantee/ Corporate Guarantee respectively.

¶143

It is hereby clarified that upon implementation of the Resolution Plan, all the rights, title and interest of the Corporate Debtor in all its assets shall vest with the Corporate Debtor, free and clear of all Encumbrances.

¶144

E) PROVISION RELATING TO PENDING DISPUTES/ LITIGATIONS

¶145

The submitted by the Applicant that the various Disputes/ Court Cases pertaining to the Corporate Debtor are listed in the Resolution Plan in Para 4.3 the Chapter 4. Apart from that there may be Disputes/ Court Cases during the CIRP period which Resolution Applicant is unaware of. All these disputes arose against the Corporate Debtor prior to admission of Corporate Debtor to CIRP or during the CIRP Period. On the date of approval of Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan. In these matters, the Resolution Applicant as well as assets and properties of the Corporate Debtor are also protected under Section 32A of the IBC.

¶146

Any amount determined to be payable by the Corporate Debtor arising out of such disputes will be settled within the amounts provided to be paid to the various Creditors/ Obligors and no further amount will be required to be paid

¶147

Page 18 of 34

¶148

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶149

by the Corporate Debtor/ Resolution Applicant to discharge any such liability.

¶150

As such the Resolution Applicant/ Corporate Debtor will be treated as having full immunity from any Liability/ Demand/ Claim arising out of any Petition/ Suit/ Application for recovery of dues from the Judgement Debtors in terms of the Arbitration Award/ Decree issued in this regard and all proceedings within the ambit of Section 32A of IBC.

¶151

For removal of any ambiguity or any doubt, it is clarified that if any award or benefit is accruing in favour of the Corporate Debtor in relation to such litigations as mentioned in this section or any other similar litigation or any other claims made by the Corporate debtor including but not limited to the cases pending or finalized under Arbitration where the Corporate Debtor is a party; whether before or after the approval of the Resolution Plan by this Tribunal shall not extinguish, shall remain alive and shall be rightfully pursued by the Corporate Debtor and recovery from such cases will be available to the Corporate Debtor for its cash flow management and implementation of the Resolution Plan.

¶152

F) PAYMENT TOWARDS UNCLAIMED LIABILITIES OR PERSONS WHOSE CLAIMS WERE NOT ACCEPTED BY THE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

¶153

As per the financial statement of CIRP Date of the Corporate Debtor, there are some liabilities against which no claim has been received by the Applicant or mentioned in the Information Memorandum. After the approval of the

¶154

Page 19 of 34

¶155

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶156

Resolution Plan, creditor of any category shall have no right over any kind of debt (unclaimed). All unclaimed liabilities shall be settled at NIL Amount.

¶157

G) UNKNOWN / UNDISCLOSED LIABILITIES / OFF BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS

¶158

The Resolution Applicant/ Corporate Debtor shall not be liable to pay a hidden/ unknown liability with respect to the period prior to the Insolvency Commencement Date (‘ICD’) but surfacing at any future date and if in case these arises then same shall be settled at NIL Amount.

¶159

H) PROPOSAL FOR COMPLETION OF PENDING PROJECTS/ WORKING CAPITAL

¶160

In addition to all the payments as proposed under this Resolution Plan for the Creditors of the Corporate Debtor, the Resolution Applicant is also proposing to invest Rs. 1,000.00/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand Lakhs only) for the capex/ working capital and for any other issues (if any). The Resolution Applicant understands that the capex/ working capital will progress in due course of time and thus, the funds shall be managed from the funds to be brought in by the Resolution Applicant as Fresh Equity/ Quasi Equity/ Debt. Any further amount to be brought in for capex/ working capital shall be brought in by Resolution Applicant or funded from the cash flows of the Corporate Debtor as per the exigencies of circumstances at the relevant time.

¶161

Page 20 of 34

¶162

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶163

I) CAPITAL RESTRUCTURING

¶164

Current Share Capital –

¶165

As per the Information Memorandum shared by the Resolution Professional and as evident from the financial statements as on Insolvency Commencement Date the Authorised and Paid up Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor is as follows:

¶166

	Face Value	No. of Shares	Share Capital
Authorized Share C	apital
Equity Shares	10.00	2,36,99,000	23,69,90,000
Preference Shares	10.00	8,00,10,000	80,01,00,000
Total		10,37,09,000	103,70,90,000
Issued, Subscribed	& Paid Up Cap	ital
Equity Shares	10.00	58,82,350	5,88,23,500
0.01% Non- cumulative, non- convertible	10.00	2,50,000	25,00,000
preference share
Total		61,32,350	6,13,23,500

¶167

Restructuring of Share Capital –

¶168

Upon the approval of the Resolution Plan, the paid-up Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor will be restructured as follows:

¶169

Within 90 (ninety) days of the approval from the Tribunal, the entire Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Equity Share Capital of the company shall be Cancelled/ Extinguished/ Written Down to zero and no amount shall be paid to any of the existing shareholders and the Corporate Debtor/ Resolution Applicant shall be exempt from following the applicable provisions of Companies Act, 2013 and IBC, 2016 to the extent permissible in law in respect of such

¶170

Page 21 of 34

¶171

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶172

cancellation of the share capital of the Corporate Debtor, except to submit the Approved Resolution Plan to Registrar of Companies/ Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

¶173

2.The Existing Authorized Share Capital of Rs, 103,70,90,000/- (Rupees One Hundred Three Crores Seventy Lakhs Ninety Thousand only) as set out in table given above will be reorganized to 10,37,09,000 Equity Shares of Rs. 10.00/(Rupees Ten only) each. The Corporate Debtor/ Resolution Applicant shall be exempt from following the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and IBC, 2016 to the extent permissible in law for such reorganization of the Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor except to submit the Approved Resolution Plan to Registrar of Companies/ Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Post reorganization, the Authorized Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor will be as below:

¶174

Type of Shares	Number of Shares	Face Value	Authorized Share Capital
Equity Shares	10,37,09,000	10	103,70,90,000
Total	10,37,09,000	10	103,70,90,000

¶175

The MoA and AoA of the Corporate Debtor shall stand modified as per the above provisions of the Resolution Plan without requirement of any compliance under the provisions of Companies Act, 2013, any other enacted rules or regulations in this regard the Corporate Debtor/ Resolution Applicant shall be exempt from following the applicable provisions of Companies Act 2013 and IBC 2016 to the extent permissible in law, except to submit the

¶176

Page 22 of 34

¶177

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶178

Approved Resolution Plan to Registrar of Companies/ Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

¶179

The Resolution Applicant (by themselves or through their shareholders and nominees or through the cash flow of the Corporate Debtor) will induct an amount of Rs. 11,037.59/Lakhs (Rupees Eleven Thousand Thirty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand only) (towards payment of CIRP Cost/ Financial Creditor/ Operational Creditor/ Capex/ Working Capital) to implement the Resolution Plan, and, additional Funds of Rs. 1,500.00/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand and Five Hundred Lakhs only) to meet the contingencies to implement the Resolution Plan by way of Equity/ Quasi Equity/ Subordinate Debt by the Resolution Applicant (themselves or through their nominees) in tranches as may be warranted from time to time. Out of the above, the Resolution Applicant will induct Rs. 1,500.00/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand and Five Hundred Lakhs only) upfront on the Effective Date as Equity capital.

¶180

After the issuance of the Equity Shares, within 90 (ninety) Days of the Approval from this Tribunal, the paid-up Equity share capital of the Corporate Debtor as on that date on a

¶181

fully diluted basis shall be as follows:

¶182

Name of New	Mode of	Number of	Face	Share Capital	Share-
Shareholders	Allotment	Shares	Value		holding %
Resolution Applicant/ its Nominees	Fresh Equity	1,50,00,000	10.00	15,00,00,000	50.00%
Secured Financial Creditors	Fresh Equity	1,50,00,000	10.00	15,00,00,000	50.00%

¶183

Page 23 of 34

¶184

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶185

Total

¶186

100.00%

¶187

3,00,00,000 10.00 30,00,00,000

¶188

10. SOURCES OF FUNDS:

¶189

The Resolution Applicant proposes to raise through equity brought by him or his nominee and Issuance of Zero Coupon Debentures (ZCDs) and from Equity as well as Quasi Equity and also debt to be mobilised by the Resolution Applicant or their nominees or from the cash from the Corporate Debtor for the implementation of the Resolution Plan. The same has been explained by the Resolution Applicant as follows:

¶190

Sr. No.	Source of Funds¹	Amount (INR Lakhs)
1.	Equityto be brought in byRA or its nominees²	1,500.00
2.	Issuance of ZCDs³	10,400.00
3.	Equity/ Quasi Equity/ Debt to be mobilised by the Resolution Applicant or their nominees/ or from the cash flow from the Corporate Debtor for payment of CIRP Cost/ Operational Creditor/ Financial Creditor/ Capex / Working Capital and Contingency fund etc. for implementationoftheResolution Plan⁴	11,037.59
Total		22,937.59

¶191

1. Funds shall be mobilised by the Resolution Applicant / Corporate Debtor or their nominees from internal accruals and their own sources as and when required for implementation of the Resolution Plan.

¶192

2. An amount of Rs. 1,500.00/- Lakhs (Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred Lakhs only) will be inducted on upfront basis as Equity.

¶193

3. ZCDs of Rs. 10,400.00/- Lakhs (Rupees Ten Thousand Four Hundred Lakhs only) will be issued as per the Resolution Plan.

¶194

4. The RA / its nominees shall induct an amount upto Rs. 11,037.59/- Lakhs (Rupees Eleven Thousand Thirty Seven Lakhs and Fifty Nine Thousand only) as Equity / Subordinate Equity / Quasi Equity / Subordinate Debt / cash flow from CD for implementation of the “Resolution Plan”. In case further funds are required the RA or their nominees may bring additional funds by way of Equity / Quasi Equity / Subordinate Debt.

¶195

11. FINANCIAL OUTLAY:

¶196

The Resolution Professional has submitted the following chart showing the details of the Financial Outlay under Resolution Plan as under:

¶197

Particulars	INR Lakhs
Financial Outlay

¶198

Page 24 of 34

¶199

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶200

Upfront payment toward CIRP Cost	300.00
Resolution of Debt of Secured Financial Creditors	20,000.00
Payment towards claims of Workmen & Employees	50.00
Payment towards provisions provided in the Balance Sheet of the Corporate Debtor/Contingencies	87.59
Proposal for Capital Expenditure/ Working Capital	1,000.00
Contingencies Fund	1,500.00
Total	229,37.59

¶201

In view of the above Financial Outlay the total upfront Cash Recovery

¶202

for stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor is as follows:

¶203

Particulars	INR lakh
Provision for CIRP Cost	300.00
Payment towards Employees and Workmen	50.00
Payment towards provision provided in B/S	87.59
Upfront Payment to SFCs	1,500.00
Total Upfront Payment	1,937.59

¶204

The indicative Repayment Tenure towards various creditors in the events for implementation of Resolution plan from approval date is as

¶205

follows:-

¶206

Sr.	Activity	Time Line
No.
1	Date on which the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) approves the Resolution Plan i.e., NCLTApproval Date	T
2	Constitution of Monitoring Committee	T
	Removal of existing Directors on the Board of Corporate
3	Debtor and Reorganisation of Share Capital of Corporate Debtor	T + 90 Days

¶207

Page 25 of 34

¶208

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III

¶209

I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶210

4	Appointment of new Directors on the Board of the Corporate Debtor	T + 90 Days
5	Payment Towards CIRP Costs	T + 90 Days
6	Payment towards Operational Creditors (Including Employees)	T + 90 Days
7	Upfront Payment to Secured Financial Creditors	T + 90 Days
8	Complete Takeover of the management and control of the Corporate Debtor, including its books, records and assets, rights, properties by Resolution Applicant i.e., Effective Date	T + 90 Days = E
9	Deferred Payment as per schedule given above	E + 36 Months
10	Zero Coupon Debentures Redemption/ Buyback by the Resolution Applicant/ or its nominees	E + 60 Months

¶211

The Resolution Applicant is eligible to submit resolution plan. The Successful Resolution Applicant has given an Affidavit satisfying the eligibility criteria as per the provisions under section 29A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

¶212

15. OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS:

¶213

i. As per IBC Code 30(2)(a) – A Resolution Plan provides for the payment of insolvency resolution process costs in a manner specified by the Board in priority to the payment of other debts of the corporate debtor.

¶214

ii. As per Section 30(2)(b), the Respondent has agreed to pay Operational Creditors an amount which shall not be less than liquidation value or the amount that would have been paid to such creditors if the amount to be distributed under the Resolution Plan is distributed in accordance with priority under Section 53(1), whichever is higher.

¶215

Page 26 of 34

¶216

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶217

iii. The Resolution Applicant has agreed to meet the cost of project from existing resources including infusion of equity/debt through the parent company, from sale of unsold inventories and if required from raising finance through external sources.

¶218

iv. The Resolution Applicant has also agreed that dissenting Financial Creditors shall be paid in priority and not less than the value they would have been paid in the event of liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent has proposed to liquidation value to Unsecured Financial Creditors who dissent from the plan.

¶219

v. Provides for the management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor after approval of the Resolution Plan. Section 30(2)(c).

¶220

vi. Provides for a term of the plan, implementation schedule and supervision of the Resolution Plan under Section 30 (2)(d) & Regulation 38(2)(c).

¶221

vii. The Resolution Applicant proposes to appoint suitably qualified and experienced persons, key personnel and other officer for operations of the Corporate Debtor.

¶222

viii. The Resolution Plan does not contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force - please include a statement to this effect in the Resolution Plan as per Section 30(2)(e).

¶223

ix. The Resolution Applicant has given a declaration that the Resolution Plan does not contravene any provisions of the law for the time being in force as per Section 30(2)(f).

¶224

x. As per IBBI Guidelines 38(1)(b) - The amount payable under a Resolution Plan - to the financial creditors, who have a right to vote under Sub-section (2) of Section 21

¶225

Page 27 of 34

¶226

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶227

and did not vote in favour of the Resolution Plan, shall be paid in priority over financial creditors who voted in favour of the plan.

¶228

xi. The Resolution Applicant or any of its related parties has not failed to implement or contributed to the failure of implementation of any other resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority at any time in the past.

¶229

xii. The Resolution Plan is in compliance of the Regulation 38 of the Regulations in terms of Section 30(2)(f) as under:

¶230

a. The amount due to the operational creditors under a resolution plan shall be given priority in payment over financial creditors [Regulation 38(1)].

¶231

b. The Resolution Plan has all the adequate means of supervising of the implementation of the Plan as required under Regulation 38(2)(c), of the IBBI, Insolvency resolution process for corporate persons, Regulation 2016.

¶232

c. Provides for the payment of CIRP Costs in priority to the repayment of any other debts of the Company [Regulation 38(1)(a)].

¶233

d. Provides for the manner of implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plan and adequate means for implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plan.

¶234

e. The amount payable under a resolution plan to the Financial Creditors, who have right to vote under Subsection (2) of Section 21 and did not vote in favor of the resolution plan, shall be paid in priority over financial creditors who voted in favour of the plan.

¶235

Page 28 of 34

¶236

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶237

f. The Resolution Applicant confirms that to the best of the knowledge of the Resolution Applicant, the Resolution Plan is not in contravention of the provisions of Applicable Law and is in compliance with the Code and the CIRP Regulations.

¶238

g. The Resolution Applicant confirms that the Resolution Applicant and its connected persons are not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the Code and other provisions of the Code and any other Applicable Law.

¶239

h. Provides for the management and control of the business of the Corporate Debtor during its term.

¶240

i. All the above factors demonstrate that the plan address the cause of default and the Resolution Applicant has the capacity to implement the Resolution Plan.

¶241

j. That the Resolution Applicant or any of its related parties has never failed to implement or contributed to the failure of implementation of any other Resolution Plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority at any time in the past. This is in compliance of Regulation 38(1)(b) of the Regulations.

¶242

k. The interests of all stakeholders (including Financial Creditors, Operational Creditors and other Creditors, Guarantors, Members, Employees and other Stakeholders of the Company, keeping in view the objectives of the Code [Regulation 38(1A)].

¶243

The Resolution Plan has been approved in the 13^th COC meeting held on 24.03.2022 with 100% voting in accordance with the provisions of the Code.

¶244

Page 29 of 34

¶245

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶246

In K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank & Others: 2019 SCC Online SC 257 (2019) 12 SCC 150) the Hon’ble Apex Court held that if the CoC had approved the Resolution Plan by requisite percent of voting share, then as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the Resolution Professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). On receipt of such a proposal, the Adjudicating Authority is required to satisfy itself that the Resolution Plan as approved by CoC meets the requirements specified in Section 30(2). The Hon’ble Court observed that the role of the NCLT is ‘no more and no less’. The Hon’ble Court further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan “as approved” by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors. Even in that enquiry, the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority can reject the Resolution Plan is in reference to matters specified in Section 30(2) when the Resolution Plan does not conform to the stated requirements.

¶247

The Hon’ble Apex Court at para 42 in Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors.: (2019) SCC Online , c learly laid down that the Adjudicating Authority would not have power to modify the Resolution Plan which the CoC in their commercial wisdom have approved.

¶248

“Para 42- Thus, it is clear that the limited judicial review available, which can in no circumstance trespass upon a business decision of the majority of the Committee of Creditors, has to be within the four corners of section 30(2) of the Code, insofar as the Adjudicating Authority is concerned, and section 32 read with section 61(3) of the Code, insofar as the Appellate

¶249

Page 30 of 34

¶250

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶251

Tribunal is concerned, the parameters of such review having been clearly laid down in K. Sashidhar (supra).”

¶252

In view of the above ruling of the Apex Court, the legislature has given paramount importance to the commercial wisdom of committee of creditors (CoC) and the scope of judicial review by the Adjudicating Authority (AA) is limited to the extent provided under section 31 of Code and of the Appellate Authority is limited to the extent provided under sub-section (3) of section 61 of the Code, is no more an untouched-matter.

¶253

In view of the discussions and the law thus settled, the instant Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A) and 39(4) of the Regulations. The Resolution Plan is not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and is in accordance with law. The Resolution Plan is feasible and viable. There are no workers claims. Resolution Applicant agreed to pay the full CIRP costs and also future costs if any as certified by the Resolution Professional and CoC. The Resolution Plan balances the interest of all the stakeholders and thus it deserves to be approved.

¶254

ORDER

¶255

i. The Interlocutory Application No. 991 of 2022 is allowed. The Resolution Plan submitted by Mr. Madhav Dhir , is hereby approved. It shall become effective from this date and shall form part of this order. It shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority to

¶256

Page 31 of 34

¶257

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶258

whom a debt in respect of payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is due.

¶259

ii. The approval of the Resolution Plan shall not be construed as waiver of any statutory obligations of the Corporate Debtor and shall be dealt by the appropriate Authorities in accordance with law. It is seen that the Resolution Applicant sought several dispensations, concessions and waivers. Any waiver sought in the Resolution plan shall be subject to approval by the Authority concerned in the light of the Judgment of Supreme Court in Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v/s. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, the relevant para’s of which are extracted herein below:

¶260

“on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in, respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.”

¶261

“95. (i) Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of the resolution plan shall stand extinguished

¶262

Page 32 of 34

¶263

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶264

and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan;

¶265

(ii) 2019 Amendment to Section 31 of the I&B Code is clarificatory and declaratory in nature and therefore will be effective from the date on which the Code has come into effect; (iii) consequently, all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued.”

¶266

iii. We shall clarify here that any amount recovered under any avoidance applications relating to the Corporate Debtor being allowed by the Adjudicating Authority would ensure unto the benefit of the Resolution Applicant.

¶267

iv. The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), concerned for information and record. The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed.

¶268

v. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall cease to have effect from this date.

¶269

Page 33 of 34

¶270

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-III I.A. No. 991 of 2022 IN C.P. No.297/MB/2019

¶271

vi. The Applicant and the Monitoring Committee shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and the Applicant shall file status of its implementation before this Authority from time to time, preferably every quarter.

¶272

vii. The Applicant shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI along with copy of this Order for information.

¶273

viii. The Applicant shall forthwith send a copy of this Order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant for necessary compliance.

¶274

ix. The Interlocutory Application No. 991 of 2022 is accordingly allowed and disposed of .

¶275

Sd/Sd/MADHU SINHA H. V. SUBBA RAO MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

¶276

Page 34 of 34

In the matter of Digicable Networks (India) Limited I.A. No. 991 of 2022 in C.P. No. 297 of 2019

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

In the matter of Digicable Networks (India) Limited I.A. No. 991 of 2022 in C.P. No. 297 of 2019

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases