In the matter of State Bank of India v. Satish Kumar Soin, Cp (Ib) No. 153/Chd/Pb/2021
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH (through web-based video conferencing platform)
Item No.40 CP(IB) No. 153/Chd/Pb/2021 Under Section 95, IBC 2016
In the matter of:- State Bank of India ….Petitioner Vs. Satish Kumar Soin ….Respondent
Present through Video Conferencing:
Mr. Baldev Singh Badhran, Advocate for the petitioner
As per report of Registry, antecedents of Mr. Kuldip Kumar Bassi, Proposed Resolution Professional having Registration No.IBBI/IPA001/IP-P00280/2017-18/10524 have been verified. He is appointed as Resolution Professional and directed to comply with the provisions of Section 99 and file the report accordingly within two weeks.
In the meantime, issue limited notice of this petition to the respondent for presence within two weeks, returnable on or before 29.09.2022. If already issued then learned counsel for petitioner is direct to file affidavit to that effect that notice has been served upon respondent with proof of service before the next date of hearing. List on 29.09.2022.
Sd/Sd/- (Subrata Kumar Dash) (Harnam Singh Thakur) Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State Bank of India
- respondent
Satish Kumar Soin
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court