Financial Officer) and was serving the Corporate Debtor in the same capacity even after the commencement of CIRP. The Appellant has faced medical problems and sought sick leave of five days by email dated 06.07.2017 and the same was denied by the Respondent. The appellant submitted a resignation on 27.07.2017 through email on health grounds. Afterwards, the parties exchanged various emails wherein the authorised person of Corporate Debtor sought confirmation for filing resignation with RoC and Stock Exchanges and the Appellant has demanded release of salary for the month of June and July, 2017. On 10.10.2017, the Appellant has withdrawn his resignation as the RP has failed to accept the resignation. The Respondent has rejected an amount of Rs. 1,70,000/- i.e. one month salary in lieu of the fact that appellant has not served one month notice and further rejected Rs. 32,903/- from the salary of July, 2017 as the salary of the said month is payable for 21 days only. 5. Hence, it is prayed to direct the respondent to accept the claim of Rs. 7,33,372/- in toto as the resignation tendered by the appellant was not accepted by the Respondent and that resignation does not hold any effect at all. 6. The respondent has filed a reply vide Diary No. 4545 dated 03.09.2019 wherein it has been stated that the appellant has stopped coming to the company and stopped replying to the queries imposed by the relevant officer of the Corporate Debtor. The one-month salary was rejected on the ground that the claimant did not serve notice period and resigned immediately on 27.07.2017 from the company. As per the terms of his appointment he had to serve two months' notice or give up one month's salary in lieu of his advance notice. The PF, TDS and other deductions from June and July, 2017 salary were deposited to the Income Tax Department and other Authorities on his behalf and
