order, a note has been filed by Resolution Applicant vide diary No.00071/14 dated 10.03.2022, whereby it has been stated that the Resolution Professional cannot continue to act on behalf of the Corporate Debtor once the plan is approved and the new management takes over ( Venus Recreators Vs. Union of India) and referred to the NCLAT’s decision in the matter of 63 Moons Technologies Limited, where it has been clarified that the recovery, if any, made pursuant avoidance transaction shall always be for the benefit of the creditors of the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Applicant also undertakes in its affidavit dated 15.12.2021, that the PUFE transactions application will not be pursued by the Successful Resolution Applicant nor the Corporate Debtor would have any entitlement over such sums if any, recovered, realized, or received under such applications. The benefits/sums/realization arising out in relation to the said applications shall be distributed/among/ between the Members of COC. As per the order dated 10.03.2022, of this Adjudicating Authority, to deal with the mechanism for the treatment of the recoveries which may be received in lieu of pending avoidance transaction applications, compliance affidavit of Mr. Vivek Raheja, Resolution Professional filed vide diary No.01008/2 dated 14.03.2022, whereby, it has been stated that Resolution Professional conducted 17th COC meeting on 11.03.2022, to discuss the addendum to the Resolution Plan filed by Successful Resolution Applicant. Further, it is stated in the said affidavit that in the said meeting, CoC members approved with 97.97% voting share that the Monitoring Committee will pursue the PUFE application filed by the Resolution Professional till its dissolution and by Punjab National Bank (Lead Banker) thereafter; the recovery from the PUFE applications filed before this Adjudicating Authority