CP(IB) No. 140/Chd/Hry/2019 Under Section 9, IBC 2016. Petitioner issued withdrawal of petition after entire claim amount was paid.
The petition under Section 9 of the IBC 2016 was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH ( through web-based video conferencing platform )
Item 23
CP(IB) No. 140/Chd/Hry/2019 Under Section 9, IBC 2016
In the matter of:-
Air Works India (Engineering) Pvt. Ltd.
….Petitioner-Operational Creditor
Vs
Bird Execujet Airport Services Pvt. Ltd
…Respondent-Corporate Debtor Present through Video Conferencing:
Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri with Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocates for petitioner. Mr. Ish Mahajan, Advocate for respondent.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire claim amount has been paid by the respondent-corporate debtor to the petitioner and on instructions he wants to withdraw the present petition. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/Sd/- (Subrata Kumar Dash) (Harnam Singh Thakur) Member (Technical) Member (Judicial) May 18, 2022 HM
CP(IB) No. 140/Chd/Hry/2019
Air Works India (Engineering) Pvt. Ltd.
Bird Execujet Airport Services Pvt. Ltd
Subrata Kumar Dash
Harnam Singh Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
