Allowed

In the matter of Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd. Inv. P. 04-JPR-2021 & Ia No. 295,297,349,351,,354 & 355-JPR-2021 in Cp No. (IB)-49-7-JPR-2019

NCLT1 Nov 2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bench disposed of multiple applications including settlement reports and intervention petitions. The Corporate Application Petition No. 4917 was allowed to be withdrawn due to a settlement between the financial creditors and the corporate debtor. The corporate debtor was released from CIRP rigours.

What did the court decide?

CP No. 4917/JPR/2019 allowed to be withdrawn; Corporate Debtor released from CIRP rigours; IRP to hand over possession to Board.

In the matter of Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd. Inv. P… — Company and Corporate | NCLT (2021)

¶1

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

( t h r o ug h w e b - b a s e d vi de o c o nfer e n cin g p I atfo r m)

¶3

Item No. 104 Inv. P" 04lJPRl2O2l IA No. 295lJPRl2A2l IA No. 297lJPW202l IA No.349/JPW202L IA No. 351/JPR/202L IA No. 354/JPR/2021 IA No. 355/JPR/2021 In CP No. (IB)-4917lJPRlzOtg Under Section 7 of IBC, 2016

¶4

In the matter of:

¶5

M/s Small Industries Development Bank of India

¶6

".. "Financial^{Creditor/ Applicant}

¶7

Versus

¶8

M/s Nirmal lnductomelts Pvt. Ltd"

¶9

.....Corporate Debtorl Respondent

¶10

CoTam: HON'BLE MR. DEEP CHANDRA JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE MR. RAGHU NAYYAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER Present Through Video Conferencing: -

¶11

For the Applicant : Naresh K Sejvani, Adv. Prashant Sharma, RP

¶12

For the Respondent : Prabhansh Sharma, Adv. Anita Agarwal, Adv. for SBI

¶13

ORDER

¶14

IA No. 2:95/JPR/2021

¶15

t This application had been filed by the directors of the Corporate Debtor

¶16

IWs Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd., prior to the pronouncement of the order

¶17

admitting the petition for CIRP. It was pleaded therein that the matter be released

¶18

from reserved order and be considered under settlement. The same is infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

¶19

IA No. 297|JPR/2021

¶20

This application has been filed by Ms. Anita Aggarwal, Adv. on behalf of State Bank of India requesting for early hearing in the matter. While considering the matter in its entirety it is clear from the other orders in various pending IAs in the matter that this application is redundant and infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

IA No. 355/JPR/2021

¶22

This application has been filed by the IRP placing on record the first progress report in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor (lWs Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd.). The same is taken on record with just exceptions and disposed of.

¶23

Ivn. P. No. 04/JPRl202l

¶24

This application has been filed by Ms. Anita Aggarwal on behalf of State Bank of India in respect of loan dues of Rs. 22.31 crores. However, it is pointed out by Mr. Prashant Sharma, IRP that the claim amount received in Form-C is of Rs. 23 .77 Crores which constitutes slightly more than 90 %o of the financial dues t payable by the Corporate Debtor. Ms. Anita Aggarwal, present on behalf of the SBI, submits that the Corporate Debtor has entered into OTS with SBI and does not press the application for intervention. Mr" Naresh Kumar Sejvani, Adv. appearing on behalf of the suspended directors refers to an NCLAT order dated

¶25

Sdv--

¶26

12.02.2019 in IA No. 312&.336 of 2019 in CA (AT) (Ins.) No" 94 &. 95 of 2019

¶27

(Jogendra Kumar Arora vs. Dharmender Sharma & anr.) whereunder it has been held by the Hon'ble NCLAT that if a settlement is arrived at prior to constitution of CoC no intervention application on behalf of any Financial Creditor shall be entertained. However, the issue is redundant in view of the settlement arrived at between SBI and the Corporate Debtor in question. Hence, Intervention Petition No. 04/JPN2021 is disposed of as being infructuous"

¶28

IA No. 354/JPR/2021

¶29

This application has been filed by Prashant Sharma, IRP, further to the OTS arrived at between SIDBI and the Corporate Debtor (M/s Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt" Ltd.) in respect of loan dues of Rs. 1.75 crores. The same is confirmed by the IRP and the copy of the relevant Form-FA has been filed in the application moved by the IRP.

¶30

IA No. 349lJPRl202l

¶31

This application has been filed by Mr. Prabhansh Sharma, Adv., on behalf of SIDBI, regarding Form-FA provided by SIDBI and OTS settlement of the matter betwqen SIDBI and the Corporate Debtor (Nfls Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd.) in re ,ect^{of loan dues of Rs.1.75 crores.}

¶32

IA No. 349|JPR/2021 & IA No. 354lJPRl202l are taken up together. In view of the statement of the counsel for SBI that an OTS has been arrived at between SBI and the Corporate Debtor and the aforesaid two applications, IA No.

¶33

J4-

¶34

S"l

¶35

349|JPN202I & IA No. 3541JPN202I that are filed under Section l2-A & Regulation 30-A including Form-FA filed by the IRP in respect of dues of SIDBI, the application for withdrawal is duly considered by the Adjudicating Authority. In the circumstances, for the reasons mentioned in the said applications and in view of the compliance of the Code and Regulations, the aforesaid IAs are allowed and accordingly CP 4917lJPRl2019 is allowed to be withdrawn in view of the settlement. The respondent / Corporate Debtor is released from all rigours of CIRP and the IRP shall handover the possession / control of the Corporate Debtor along with the records if any, to the Board. Mr. Prabhansh Sharma, Adv. appearing on behalf of SIDBI confirmed that the payment of fee / expenses to the IRP shall be completed within two days. IA No. 349llPW202l & IA No. 354|JPN202I are accordingly disposed of.

¶36

IA No. 351/JPR/2021

¶37

This application has been filed by IRP under Section l9(2) and 19(3) for issuance of necessary directions to the respondents to provide the requisite information to the IRP for discharging his duties. In view of the aforesaid orders regarding withdrawal of the CP No" 4917lJPN20l9 this application is infructuous and is disposed accordingly.

Sd-

sd.-

CP No. 49l7lJPRl20l9

CP No. (IB)-49l71JPR/2019 is disposed of as settled"

¶42

Any other pending IAs in the matter are also disposed of.

¶43

S"l

¶44

(Raghu Nayyar) Technical Member

¶45

-!4^-

¶46

(Dee)-Chandra Joshi) Judicial Member

¶47

November Otr ,2021 M.S"

In the matter of Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd. Inv. P. 04-JPR-2021 & Ia No. 295,297,349,351,,354 & 355-JPR-2021 in Cp No. (IB)-49-7-JPR-2019

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

In the matter of Nirmal Inductomelts Pvt. Ltd. Inv. P. 04-JPR-2021 & Ia No. 295,297,349,351,,354 & 355-JPR-2021 in Cp No. (IB)-49-7-JPR-2019

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases