The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of a company petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, as the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled.
The interim application was allowed to withdraw the petition, and CP (IB) No.09/GB/2021 was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH GUWAHATI
ITEM NO.17 IA (IBC)/59/2021
IN C.P. (IB)No.09/GB/2021
Coram:
Hon’ble Shri Rohit Kapoor, Member (J): Hearing through Hon’ble Shri Prasanta Kumar Mohanty, Member (T): Video Conference
ATTENDANCE-CUM- ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING OF GUWAHATI BENCH OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL ON 12.11.2021
Name of the Company: Grainspan Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. V/s Aruna’s Snack Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Section of the Companies Act: Rule 8 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
S. NO. NAME (CAPITAL LETTERS) DESIGNATION REPRESENTATION SIGNATURE 1. NONE Advocate Petitioner Present in Video 2. NONE Advocate Respondent Conference
O R D E R
Date of Order: 12.11.2021
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing. No one is present representing either of the sides.
2
Sd/-
Sd/-
( Prasanta Kumar Mohanty) Member (Technical) & Adjudicating Authority
(Rohit Kapoor) Member (Judicial) & Adjudicating Authority
/D-12.11.2021/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application to withdraw the company petition under Section 9 of the IBC can be allowed when the main matter is settled.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Grainspan Nutrients Pvt. Ltd.
Aruna's Snack Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Rohit Kapoor
Prasanta Kumar Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
