The National Green Tribunal Central Zone Bench disposed of an original application seeking suspension of forest clearance or action against a respondent. The court held the prayer not maintainable as an efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal was available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.02
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONE BENCH, BHOPAL (THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)
Original Application No.80/2026(CZ)
Pradeep Ahirwar & Anr. Applicant(s)
Vs.
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of Hearing: 05.05.2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. SUDHIR KUMAR CHATURVEDI, EXPERT MEMBER
For Applicant (s): Mr. Yashdeep Singh Thakur, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None
ORDER
Sheo Kumar Singh, JM
Sudhir Kumar Chaturvedi, EM
5th May, 2026, Original Application No.80/2026(CZ) AR
O.A. No.80/2026(CZ) Pradeep Ahirwar & Anr. Vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an original application filed to suspend forest clearance or initiate action is maintainable when an alternate remedy exists.
Pradeep Ahirwar & Anr.
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Sheo Kumar Singh
Sudhir Kumar Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
